Back to Search Start Over

Costs and effectiveness of alternative dog vaccination strategies to improve dog population coverage in rural and urban settings during a rabies outbreak

Authors :
Eduardo A. Undurraga
Max F. Millien
Kasim Allel
Melissa D. Etheart
Julie Cleaton
Yasmeen Ross
Ryan M. Wallace
Kelly Crowdis
Alexandra Medley
Ad Vos
Emmanuel Maciel
Benjamin Monroe
Amber Dismer
Jesse D. Blanton
Cuc H. Tran
Richard Chipman
Pierre Dilius
Fleurinord Ludder
Source :
Vaccine. 38(39)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Dog-rabies elimination programs have typically relied upon parenteral vaccination at central-point locations; however, dog-ownership practices, accessibility to hard-to-reach sub-populations, resource limitations, and logistics may impact a country's ability to reach the 70% coverage goal recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and World Health Organization (WHO). Here we report the cost-effectiveness of different dog-vaccination strategies during a dog-rabies outbreak in urban and peri-urban sections of Croix-des-Bouquets commune of the West Department, Haiti, in 2016. Three strategies, mobile static point (MSP), mobile static point with capture-vaccinate-release (MSP + CVR), and door-to-door vaccination with oral vaccination (DDV + ORV), were applied at five randomly assigned sites and assessed for free-roaming dog vaccination coverage and total population coverage. A total of 7065 dogs were vaccinated against rabies during the vaccination campaign. Overall, free-roaming dog vaccination coverage was estimated at 52% (47%-56%) for MSP, 53% (47%-60%) for DDV + ORV, and 65% (61%-69%) for MSP + CVR (differences with MSP and DDV + ORV significant at p

Details

ISSN :
18732518
Volume :
38
Issue :
39
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Vaccine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....194abbb81dd6a2e1f442128ab3c37b3b