Back to Search
Start Over
The validation status of blood biomarkers of amyloid and phospho-tau assessed with the 5-phase development framework for AD biomarkers
- Source :
- Ashton, N J, Leuzy, A, Karikari, T K, Mattsson-Carlgren, N, Dodich, A, Boccardi, M, Corre, J, Drzezga, A, Nordberg, A, Ossenkoppele, R, Zetterberg, H, Blennow, K, Frisoni, G B, Garibotto, V & Hansson, O 2021, ' The validation status of blood biomarkers of amyloid and phospho-tau assessed with the 5-phase development framework for AD biomarkers ', European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 2140-2156 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05253-y, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 48(7), 2140-2156 (2021). doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05253-y
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Purpose The development of blood biomarkers that reflect Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathophysiology (phosphorylated tau and amyloid-β) has offered potential as scalable tests for dementia differential diagnosis and early detection. In 2019, the Geneva AD Biomarker Roadmap Initiative included blood biomarkers in the systematic validation of AD biomarkers. Methods A panel of experts convened in November 2019 at a two-day workshop in Geneva. The level of maturity (fully achieved, partly achieved, preliminary evidence, not achieved, unsuccessful) of blood biomarkers was assessed based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology and discussed fully during the workshop which also evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. Results Plasma p-tau has shown analytical validity (phase 2 primary aim 1) and first evidence of clinical validity (phase 3 primary aim 1), whereas the maturity level for Aβ remains to be partially achieved. Full and partial achievement has been assigned to p-tau and Aβ, respectively, in their associations to ante-mortem measures (phase 2 secondary aim 2). However, only preliminary evidence exists for the influence of covariates, assay comparison and cut-off criteria. Conclusions Despite the relative infancy of blood biomarkers, in comparison to CSF biomarkers, much has already been achieved for phases 1 through 3 – with p-tau having greater success in detecting AD and predicting disease progression. However, sufficient data about the effect of covariates on the biomarker measurement is lacking. No phase 4 (real-world performance) or phase 5 (assessment of impact/cost) aim has been tested, thus not achieved.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
Oncology
medicine.medical_specialty
Neurology
Amyloid
tau Proteins
Review Article
Disease
Phospho tau
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Dementia
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
ddc:610
Amyloid beta-Peptides
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Aβ42
P-tau
General Medicine
Aβ40
medicine.disease
Peptide Fragments
Blood
030104 developmental biology
Positron emission tomography
Blood biomarkers
Strategic roadmap
Biomarker (medicine)
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
business
diagnostic imaging [Alzheimer Disease]
Alzheimer’s disease
Biomarkers
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 16197070
- Volume :
- 48
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....197a8d66abe490d9f7958f9ea708ea1b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05253-y