Back to Search
Start Over
Mode of Action Classifications in the EnviroTox Database:Development and Implementation of a Consensus MOA Classification
- Source :
- Kienzler, A, Connors, K A, Bonnell, M, Barron, M G, Beasley, A, Inglis, C G, Norberg-King, T J, Martin, T, Sanderson, H, Vallotton, N, Wilson, P & Embry, M R 2019, ' Mode of Action Classifications in the EnviroTox Database : Development and Implementation of a Consensus MOA Classification ', Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2294-2304 . https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4531, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Multiple mode of action (MOA) frameworks have been developed in aquatic ecotoxicology, mainly based on fish toxicity. These frameworks provide information on a key determinant of chemical toxicity, but the MOA categories and level of specificity remain unique to each of the classification schemes. The present study aimed to develop a consensus MOA assignment within EnviroTox, a curated in vivo aquatic toxicity database, based on the following MOA classification schemes: Verhaar (modified) framework, Assessment Tool for Evaluating Risk, Toxicity Estimation Software Tool, and OASIS. The MOA classifications from each scheme were first collapsed into one of 3 categories: non–specifically acting (i.e., narcosis), specifically acting, or nonclassifiable. Consensus rules were developed based on the degree of concordance among the 4 individual MOA classifications to attribute a consensus MOA to each chemical. A confidence rank was also assigned to the consensus MOA classification based on the degree of consensus. Overall, 40% of the chemicals were classified as narcotics, 17% as specifically acting, and 43% as unclassified. Sixty percent of chemicals had a medium to high consensus MOA assignment. When compared to empirical acute toxicity data, the general trend of specifically acting chemicals being more toxic is clearly observed for both fish and invertebrates but not for algae. EnviroTox is the first approach to establishing a high‐level consensus across 4 computationally and structurally distinct MOA classification schemes. This consensus MOA classification provides both a transparent understanding of the variation between MOA classification schemes and an added certainty of the MOA assignment. In terms of regulatory relevance, a reliable understanding of MOA can provide information that can be useful for the prioritization (ranking) and risk assessment of chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2294–2304. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
- Subjects :
- Prioritization
Consensus
Databases, Factual
Computer science
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Software tool
ecological risk assessment
0211 other engineering and technologies
classifications
Classification scheme
02 engineering and technology
010501 environmental sciences
computer.software_genre
Ecotoxicology
01 natural sciences
Risk Assessment
Toxicity Tests, Acute
Environmental Chemistry
Animals
Relevance (information retrieval)
Hazard/Risk Assessment
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
021110 strategic, defence & security studies
Database
Chemical toxicity
Fishes
Multiple modes
Invertebrates
EnviroTox database
Ranking
Mode of action
Fish
computer
aquatic toxicity
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Kienzler, A, Connors, K A, Bonnell, M, Barron, M G, Beasley, A, Inglis, C G, Norberg-King, T J, Martin, T, Sanderson, H, Vallotton, N, Wilson, P & Embry, M R 2019, ' Mode of Action Classifications in the EnviroTox Database : Development and Implementation of a Consensus MOA Classification ', Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2294-2304 . https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4531, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....19c83b1a833b3606de56405e783f93b1
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4531