Back to Search Start Over

A comparison between hospital follow-up and collaborative follow-up in patients with acute heart failure

Authors :
Koichi Washida
Takao Kato
Neiko Ozasa
Takeshi Morimoto
Hidenori Yaku
Yasutaka Inuzuka
Yodo Tamaki
Yuta Seko
Erika Yamamoto
Yusuke Yoshikawa
Masayuki Shiba
Takeshi Kitai
Yugo Yamashita
Ryoji Taniguchi
Moritake Iguchi
Kazuya Nagao
Yuichi Kawase
Yuji Nishimoto
Takashi Kuragaichi
Kozo Hotta
Takashi Morinaga
Mamoru Toyofuku
Yutaka Furukawa
Kenji Ando
Kazushige Kadota
Yukihito Sato
Koichiro Kuwahara
Takeshi Kimura
Source :
ESC heart failureReferences.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

AIMS: There are no previous studies focusing on collaborative follow-ups between hospitals and clinics for patients discharged after acute heart failure (AHF) in Japan. The purpose of this study was to determine the status of collaboration between hospitals and clinics for patients with AHF in Japan and to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes using a large Japanese observational database. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 4056 consecutive patients hospitalized for AHF in the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry, we analysed 2862 patients discharged to go home, who were divided into 1674 patients (58.5%) followed up at hospitals with index hospitalization (hospital follow-up group) and 1188 (41.5%) followed up in a collaborative fashion with clinics or other general hospitals (collaborative follow-up group). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization within 1year after discharge. Previous hospitalization for HF and length of hospital stay longer than 15days were associated with hospital follow-up. Conversely, ≥80years of age, hypertension, and cognitive dysfunction were associated with collaborative follow-up. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary outcome, all cause death, and cardiovascular death were similar between the hospital and collaborative follow-up groups (31.6% vs. 29.6%, P=0.51, 13.1% vs, 13.9%, P=0.35, 8.4% vs. 8.2%, P=0.96). Even after adjusting for confounders, the difference in risk for patients in the hospital follow-up group relative to those in the collaborative follow-up group remained insignificant for the primary outcome, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.97-1.27, P=0.14, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.91-1.33, P=0.33, HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.05, P=0.33). The cumulative 1-year incidence of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow-up group than in the collaborative follow-up group (25.5% vs. 21.3%, P=0.02). The risk of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow-up group than in the collaborative follow-up group (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01-1.39, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized for AHF, 41.5% received collaborative follow-up after discharge. The risk of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow-up group than in the collaborative follow-up, although risk of the primary outcome, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death were similar between groups.

Details

ISSN :
20555822
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ESC heart failureReferences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1a033c823c4654eba311f0a170f5e5c6