Back to Search Start Over

Prophylaxis vs. on‐demand treatment with BAY 81‐8973, a full‐length plasma protein‐free recombinant factor VIII product: results from a randomized trial (LEOPOLD II)

Authors :
K. Kavakli
R. Yang
L. Rusen
H. Beckmann
D. Tseneklidou‐Stoeter
M. Maas Enriquez
Renchi Yang
Yongqiang Zhao
Jing Sun
Xuefeng Wang
Depei Wu
Antonin Hlusi
Katsuyuki Fukutake
Hideji Hanabusa
Teruhisa Fujii
Oscar Pérez Ramírez
Blanca Salazar Alvarado
Margit Serban
Luminita Rusen
Valentina Uscatescu
Cristina Truica
Gordana Kostic
Nada Konstantinidis
Zoran Igrutinovic
Farida Perina
Tatiana Andreeva
Kaan Kavakli
Bulent Antmen
Ilgen Sasmaz
Alphan Kupesiz
Mehmet Akif Yesilipek
Ching‐Tien Peng
James French
Miguel Escobar
Johnny Mahlangu
Roger Pool
Ege Üniversitesi
Source :
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2015.

Abstract

WOS: 000350548500005<br />PubMed ID: 25546368<br />BackgroundBAY 81-8973 is a new full-length human recombinant factor VIII product manufactured with technologies to improve consistency in glycosylation and expression to optimize clinical performance. ObjectivesTo demonstrate superiority of prophylaxis vs. on-demand therapy with BAY 81-8973 in patients with severe hemophilia A. Patients/MethodsIn this multinational, randomized, open-label crossover study (LEOPOLD II; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01233258), males aged 12-65years with severe hemophilia A were randomized to twice-weekly prophylaxis (20-30IUkg(-1)), 3-times-weekly prophylaxis (30-40IUkg(-1)), or on-demand treatment with BAY 81-8973. Potency labeling for BAY 81-8973 was based on the chromogenic substrate assay or adjusted to the one-stage assay. Primary efficacy endpoint was annualized number of all bleeds (ABR). Adverse events (AEs) andimmunogenicity were also assessed. ResultsEighty patients (on demand, n=21; twice-weekly prophylaxis, n=28; 3-times-weekly prophylaxis, n=31) were treated and analyzed. MeanSD ABR was significantly lower with prophylaxis (twice-weekly, 5.7 +/- 7.2; 3-times-weekly, 4.3 +/- 6.5; combined, 4.9 +/- 6.8) vs. on-demand treatment (57.7 +/- 24.6; P<br />Bayer HealthCare AG, Leverkusen, GermanyBayer AGBayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals; Bayer HealthCare PharmaceuticalsBayer AGBayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals<br />This study was funded by Bayer HealthCare AG, Leverkusen, Germany. Medical writing assistance was provided by Erin P. Scott for Complete Healthcare Communications, Inc. (Chadds Ford, PA) and was fully funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.

Details

ISSN :
15387836 and 25546368
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1a4eb2c95999e1df608a170f7d836b5c