Back to Search Start Over

Cooperativity, specificity, and evolutionary stability of polycomb targeting in Drosophila

Authors :
Shani Stern
Marianne Entrevan
Noa Oded Elkayam
Aubin Thomas
Giacomo Cavalli
Hugues Parrinello
Tom Sexton
Bernd Schuettengruber
Amos Tanay
Eitan Yaffe
Institut de génétique humaine (IGH)
Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle - Montpellier GenomiX (IGF MGX)
Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle (IGF)
Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Cell Reports, Cell Reports, Elsevier Inc, 2014, 9 (1), pp.219-233. ⟨10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.072⟩, Cell Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 219-233 (2014)
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2014.

Abstract

Summary: Metazoan genomes are partitioned into modular chromosomal domains containing active or repressive chromatin. In flies, Polycomb group (PcG) response elements (PREs) recruit PHO and other DNA-binding factors and act as nucleation sites for the formation of Polycomb repressive domains. The sequence specificity of PREs is not well understood. Here, we use comparative epigenomics and transgenic assays to show that Drosophila domain organization and PRE specification are evolutionarily conserved despite significant cis-element divergence within Polycomb domains, whereas cis-element evolution is strongly correlated with transcription factor binding divergence outside of Polycomb domains. Cooperative interactions of PcG complexes and their recruiting factor PHO stabilize PHO recruitment to low-specificity sequences. Consistently, PHO recruitment to sites within Polycomb domains is stabilized by PRC1. These data suggest that cooperative rather than hierarchical interactions among low-affinity sequences, DNA-binding factors, and the Polycomb machinery are giving rise to specific and strongly conserved 3D structures in Drosophila. : Schuettengruber et al. present an extensive comparative epigenomics data set, providing new insights into cis-driven versus buffered evolution of Polycomb recruitment and Polycomb domain specificity. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and transgenic assays, they demonstrate an extremely high conservation of Polycomb repressive domains in five Drosophila species. Using Hi-C and knockout experiments, they challenge the standard hierarchical Polycomb recruitment model and demonstrate that cooperative rather than hierarchical interactions among DNA motifs, transcription factors, and Polycomb group complexes define Polycomb domains.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22111247
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cell Reports, Cell Reports, Elsevier Inc, 2014, 9 (1), pp.219-233. ⟨10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.072⟩, Cell Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 219-233 (2014)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1a74945890b02c170129624d041b1460
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.072⟩