Back to Search
Start Over
Recognizing pharmaceutical illiteracy in community pharmacy: Agreement between a practice-based interview guide and questionnaire based assessment
- Source :
- Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 14(9), 812-816. Elsevier Inc., Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 14, 9, pp. 812-816, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14(9), 812. Elsevier, Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 14, 812-816
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background Patients with limited pharmaceutical literacy are at increased risk of drug-related problems. Recognizing these patients in daily practice is difficult. The Recognition and Addressing of Limited Pharmaceutical Literacy (RALPH) interview guide was developed as practical set of questions to recognize patients with limited pharmaceutical literacy in daily pharmacy practice. Objective To compare agreement between pharmaceutical literacy measured with the RALPH guide and a validated general health literacy questionnaire. In addition, we provide insight into patients' pharmaceutical literacy using the RALPH interview guide. Methods Structured face-to-face interviews with patients who visited a community pharmacy to fill a prescription for themselves were conducted. The interview included the RALPH guide as well as the Functional Communicative Critical Health Literacy (FCCHL) questionnaire to measure general health literacy. Functional, communicative and critical skills were measured and agreement between two methods was calculated. Results Data were collected from 508 patients. Patients with limited pharmaceutical literacy, indicated by the RALPH questions, also had a lower general health literacy level according to FCCHL scores. Agreement between the RALPH guide and FCCHL questionnaire was moderate (∼60%) for the three health literacy domains. Most patients (>90%) had correct understanding of frequency and timing of medication use, but 25% did not understand warnings or precautions correctly. Finding understandable information (39%), assessing information applicability (50%) and reliability (64%) were mentioned as difficult by patients. Conclusion Patients experienced difficulties with more complex skills, e.g. interpretation of warnings or precautions when using a medicine, finding and analyzing medication information. Whereas the FCCHL questionnaire is useful to assess general health literacy, the RALPH interview guide provides insight in the level of skills needed for good medication use and is more suitable for use in a medication specific context such as community pharmacy. Context specific assessment of skills is important to provide tailored pharmaceutical care.
- Subjects :
- Male
CRITICAL HEALTH LITERACY
media_common.quotation_subject
NETHERLANDS
Pharmaceutical Science
Health literacy
Pharmacy
Context (language use)
Community Pharmacy Services
Medication
Pharmacists
030226 pharmacology & pharmacy
Literacy
Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18]
Interviews as Topic
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center
Drug Therapy
Surveys and Questionnaires
80 and over
MANAGEMENT
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Medical prescription
Pharmaceutical literacy
Functional illiteracy
media_common
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Medical education
business.industry
EDUCATION
Middle Aged
CARE
Health Literacy
Pharmaceutical care
Pharmacy practice
Female
Psychology
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15517411
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 14(9), 812-816. Elsevier Inc., Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 14, 9, pp. 812-816, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14(9), 812. Elsevier, Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 14, 812-816
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....1a89f5e485442d41053a94d37f911e47