Back to Search Start Over

A new deep learning approach integrated with clinical data for the dermoscopic differentiation of early melanomas from atypical nevi

Authors :
Alessandra Cartocci
Danica Tiodorovic
Marco Gori
Susana Puig
Elvira Moscarella
Jean-Luc Perrot
Francesca Farnetani
Monica Bianchini
Aimilios Lallas
Linda Tognetti
Cristina Carrera
Pietro Rubegni
Alberto Balistreri
Alessandro Mecocci
Giuseppe Argenziano
Caterina Longo
Simone Bonechi
Gennaro Cataldo
Elisa Cinotti
Gabriele Cevenini
Franco Scarselli
Giovanni Pellacani
Paolo Andreini
Tognetti, L.
Bonechi, S.
Andreini, P.
Bianchini, M.
Scarselli, F.
Cevenini, G.
Moscarella, E.
Farnetani, F.
Longo, C.
Lallas, A.
Carrera, C.
Puig, S.
Tiodorovic, D.
Perrot, J. L.
Pellacani, G.
Argenziano, G.
Cinotti, E.
Cataldo, G.
Balistreri, A.
Mecocci, A.
Gori, M.
Rubegni, P.
Cartocci, A.
Source :
Journal of Dermatological Science. 101:115-122
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background Timely recognition of malignant melanoma (MM) is challenging for dermatologists worldwide and represents the main determinant for mortality. Dermoscopic examination is influenced by dermatologists’ experience and fails to achieve adequate accuracy and reproducibility in discriminating atypical nevi (AN) from early melanomas (EM). Objective We aimed to develop a Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) model able to support dermatologists in the classification and management of atypical melanocytic skin lesions (aMSL). Methods A training set (630 images), a validation set (135) and a testing set (214) were derived from the idScore dataset of 979 challenging aMSL cases in which the dermoscopic image is integrated with clinical data (age, sex, body site and diameter) and associated with histological data. A DCNN_aMSL architecture was designed and then trained on both dermoscopic images of aMSL and the clinical/anamnestic data, resulting in the integrated “iDCNN_aMSL” model. Responses of 111 dermatologists with different experience levels on both aMSL classification (intuitive diagnosis) and management decisions (no/long follow-up; short follow-up; excision/preventive excision) were compared with the DCNNs models. Results In the lesion classification study, the iDCNN_aMSL achieved the best accuracy, reaching an AUC = 90.3 %, SE = 86.5 % and SP = 73.6 %, compared to DCNN_aMSL (SE = 89.2 %, SP = 65.7 %) and intuitive diagnosis of dermatologists (SE = 77.0 %; SP = 61.4 %). Conclusions The iDCNN_aMSL proved to be the best support tool for management decisions reducing the ratio of inappropriate excision. The proposed iDCNN_aMSL model can represent a valid support for dermatologists in discriminating AN from EM with high accuracy and for medical decision making by reducing their rates of inappropriate excisions.

Details

ISSN :
09231811
Volume :
101
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Dermatological Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1ac041c2e90154187e3869c171b50be9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2020.11.009