Back to Search
Start Over
Halo assembly bias and the tidal anisotropy of the local halo environment
- Source :
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc., Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc., 2018, 476 (3), pp.3631-3647. ⟨10.1093/mnras/sty496⟩, Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc., 2018, 476 (3), pp.3631-3647. 〈10.1093/mnras/sty496〉, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy P-Oxford Open Option A, 2018, 476 (3), pp.3631-3647. ⟨10.1093/mnras/sty496⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- We study the role of the local tidal environment in determining the assembly bias of dark matter haloes. Previous results suggest that the anisotropy of a halo's environment (i.e, whether it lies in a filament or in a more isotropic region) can play a significant role in determining the eventual mass and age of the halo. We statistically isolate this effect using correlations between the large-scale and small-scale environments of simulated haloes at $z=0$ with masses between $10^{11.6}\lesssim (m/h^{-1}M_{\odot})\lesssim10^{14.9}$. We probe the large-scale environment using a novel halo-by-halo estimator of linear bias. For the small-scale environment, we identify a variable $\alpha_R$ that captures the $\textit{tidal anisotropy}$ in a region of radius $R=4R_{\textrm{200b}}$ around the halo and correlates strongly with halo bias at fixed mass. Segregating haloes by $\alpha_R$ reveals two distinct populations. Haloes in highly isotropic local environments ($\alpha_R\lesssim0.2$) behave as expected from the simplest, spherically averaged analytical models of structure formation, showing a $\textit{negative}$ correlation between their concentration and large-scale bias at $\textit{all}$ masses. In contrast, haloes in anisotropic, filament-like environments ($\alpha_R\gtrsim0.5$) tend to show a $\textit{positive}$ correlation between bias and concentration at any mass. Our multi-scale analysis cleanly demonstrates how the overall assembly bias trend across halo mass emerges as an average over these different halo populations, and provides valuable insights towards building analytical models that correctly incorporate assembly bias. We also discuss potential implications for the nature and detectability of galaxy assembly bias.<br />Comment: 19 pages, 15 figures; v2: revised in response to referee comments, added references and discussion, conclusions unchanged. Accepted in MNRAS
- Subjects :
- Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Structure formation
[ PHYS.ASTR ] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]
Dark matter
FOS: Physical sciences
Astrophysics
Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
01 natural sciences
dark matter
methods: numerical
cosmology: theory
0103 physical sciences
Halo effect
Anisotropy
010303 astronomy & astrophysics
Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics
Physics
010308 nuclear & particles physics
Isotropy
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Radius
Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Galaxy
Space and Planetary Science
Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Halo
large-scale structure of Universe
[PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00358711 and 13652966
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....1b17678dd02e13573e0f40e9c5df244a
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty496