Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical validation of a computerized algorithm to determine mean systemic filling pressure
- Source :
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 36(1), 191-198. Springer Netherlands, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 36(1), 191-198. Springer, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
- Publication Year :
- 2022
- Publisher :
- Springer, 2022.
-
Abstract
- Mean systemic filling pressure (Pms) is a promising parameter in determining intravascular fluid status. Pms derived from venous return curves during inspiratory holds with incremental airway pressures (Pms-Insp) estimates Pms reliably but is labor-intensive. A computerized algorithm to calculate Pms (Pmsa) at the bedside has been proposed. In previous studies Pmsa and Pms-Insp correlated well but with considerable bias. This observational study was performed to validate Pmsa with Pms-Insp in cardiac surgery patients. Cardiac output, right atrial pressure and mean arterial pressure were prospectively recorded to calculate Pmsa using a bedside monitor. Pms-Insp was calculated offline after performing inspiratory holds. Intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) and assessment of agreement were used to compare Pmsa with Pms-Insp. Bias, coefficient of variance (COV), precision and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated. Proportional bias was assessed with linear regression. A high degree of inter-method reliability was found between Pmsa and Pms-Insp (ICC 0.89; 95%CI 0.72–0.96, p = 0.01) in 18 patients. Pmsa and Pms-Insp differed not significantly (11.9 mmHg, IQR 9.8–13.4 vs. 12.7 mmHg, IQR 10.5–14.4, p = 0.38). Bias was −0.502 ± 1.90 mmHg (p = 0.277). COV was 4% with LOA –4.22 − 3.22 mmHg without proportional bias. Conversion coefficient Pmsa ➔ Pms-Insp was 0.94. This assessment of agreement demonstrates that the measures Pms-Insp and the computerized Pmsa-algorithm are interchangeable (bias −0.502 ± 1.90 mmHg with conversion coefficient 0.94). The choice of Pmsa is straightforward, it is non-interventional and available continuously at the bedside in contrast to Pms-Insp which is interventional and calculated off-line. Further studies should be performed to determine the place of Pmsa in the circulatory management of critically ill patients. (www.clinicaltrials.gov; TRN NCT04202432, release date 16-12-2019; retrospectively registered).Clinical Trial Registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT04202432, initial release date 16-12-2019 (retrospectively registered).
- Subjects :
- Cardiac output
Venous return
Mean arterial pressure
medicine.medical_specialty
Coefficient of variation
Health Informatics
Mean systemic filling pressure
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
030202 anesthesiology
Linear regression
Humans
Medicine
Arterial Pressure
Original Research
Monitoring, Physiologic
Right atrial pressure
business.industry
Central venous pressure
Reproducibility of Results
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
Cardiac surgery
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Mean circulatory filling pressure
business
Inspiratory hold
Algorithm
Algorithms
Venous return curve
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 13871307
- Volume :
- 36
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....1bf7d3ede540cca592227997de8f69b4