Back to Search Start Over

The usefulness of 99mTc sulfur colloid bone marrow scintigraphy combined with 111In leucocyte scintigraphy in prosthetic joint infection

Authors :
Marc-Etienne Meyer
Eric Havet
Isabelle El Esper
Patrice Mertl
L. Saidi
Cyrille Blondet
V. Moullart
J.L. Schmit
Brigitte Canarelli
Source :
Nuclear Medicine Communications. 25:171-175
Publication Year :
2004
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2004.

Abstract

Aim To assess the extent to which bone marrow scintigraphy (BMS) makes the interpretation of leucocyte scintigraphy (LS) easier and improves its diagnostic value. Methods Seventy-three 111In LSs, 99mTc hydroxymethylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphies (BSs) and 99mTc sulfur colloid BMSs were performed in 60 patients with suspected infection related to a hip prosthesis or knee prosthesis, either in situ (+group, n = 43) or after removal for septic loosening (-group, n = 30). Bacteriological samples were obtained from all patients. LS was interpreted together with BS (LS-BS) or with BMS (LS-BMS) by three independent readers. Results The concordance among readers, estimated by the kappa test, was average with LS-BS (kappa/kappam coefficients = 0.58, 0.58 and 0.46, respectively, for the three pairs of readers) and excellent with LS-BMS (kappa/kappam coefficients = 1.00 for the three pairs of readers). With LS-BS, 64/219 interpretations were equivocal whereas only one was equivocal with LS-BMS. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of LS-BMS were, respectively, 80%, 94% and 91% in the +group, and 33%, 100% and 93% in the -group. Conclusion We conclude that (1) the interpretation of the results for LS-BMS is very easy, in contrast to LS-BS; (2) the diagnostic value of LS-BMS for detecting infected joint prostheses is good; and (3) additional data are needed to assess the accuracy of LS-BMS when the prosthesis has been removed.

Details

ISSN :
01433636
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1dc3437d74ced42ef2629a2369008841
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-200402000-00014