Back to Search Start Over

Lenalidomide versus bortezomib maintenance after frontline autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Authors :
Markus Munder
Hartmut Goldschmidt
Hans Salwender
Marc S. Raab
Jana Schlenzka
Martin Goerner
Marc-Andrea Baertsch
Martin Hoffmann
Peter Brossart
Dirk Hose
Anna Jauch
Jan Dürig
Stephan Fuhrmann
Steffen Luntz
Christina Kunz
Jens Hillengaß
Hans-Walter Lindemann
Kai Neben
Elias K. Mai
Henk M. Lokhorst
Thomas Hielscher
Ulrich Dührsen
Igor Wolfgang Blau
Hans Martin
Mathias Hänel
Pieter Sonneveld
Christof Scheid
Katja Weisel
Uta Bertsch
Helga Bernhard
Anja Seckinger
Britta Besemer
German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG)
Hematology
Basic (bio-) Medical Sciences
Anatomy and neurosciences
Source :
Blood Cancer Journal, German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) 2021, ' Lenalidomide versus bortezomib maintenance after frontline autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma ', Blood cancer journal, vol. 11, no. 1, 1 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-020-00390-3, Blood Cancer Journal, 11(1):1. Nature Publishing Group, Blood cancer journal, 11(1):1. Nature Publishing Group, Blood Cancer Journal, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Nature Publishing Group, 2021.

Abstract

Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance (MT) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard of care in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) but has not been compared to other agents in clinical trials. We retrospectively compared bortezomib (BTZ; n = 138) or LEN (n = 183) MT from two subsequent GMMG phase III trials. All patients received three cycles of BTZ-based triplet induction and post-ASCT MT. BTZ MT (1.3 mg/m2 i.v.) was administered every 2 weeks for 2 years. LEN MT included two consolidation cycles (25 mg p.o., days 1–21 of 28 day cycles) followed by 10–15 mg/day for 2 years. The BTZ cohort more frequently received tandem ASCT (91% vs. 33%) due to different tandem ASCT strategies. In the LEN and BTZ cohort, 43% and 46% of patients completed 2 years of MT as intended (p = 0.57). Progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.83, p = 0.18) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.70, p = 0.15) did not differ significantly with LEN vs. BTZ MT. Patients with n = 54 vs. BTZ: n = 84), LEN MT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.61, p = 0.04) but not OS (HR = 0.46, p = 0.09). In conclusion, the significant PFS benefit after eliminating the impact of different tandem ASCT rates supports the current standard of LEN MT after ASCT.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20445385
Volume :
11
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Blood Cancer Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1dea567af161bdc07548c1280a7d542c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-020-00390-3