Evaluation of the Surgeons’ Approach to HIV Infection

Introduction: The number of persons diagnosed as HIV positive is increasing rapidly in Turkey. Although the overall prevalence of the disease is still low, the increase of newly diagnosed persons emerges an important concern dealing with the awareness of the clinicians, and especially the surgeons. The aim of the study is to evaluate the approach of surgeons to HIV infection in the hospital. Materials and Methods: A 12-item self-administered anonymous questionnaire about the HIV infection with true and false options was developed. The questionnaire also included the specialty, age, duration of occupation and position of the surgeons. The questions were targeted to learn the knowledge and attitude about transmission route, occupational risk of acquiring HIV infection, prophylaxis for prevention, reluctance for operation and current drug therapy. The questionnaires were voluntarily filled by surgeons in November 2017. The descriptive statistics of the study were calculated as numbers and percentages. Yates’ corrected chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used in comparative analysis. Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation test was used for comparison of continuous variables and correlation, respectively. Results: The total number of filled questionnaires was 90. In 90 of them, the demographic fields were filled. Among 90 surgeons, 37% (33/90) were assistant doctors between the ages of 25-31 years, and the duration of occupation was between 1-6 years. The remaining was older than 31 years of age and the duration of occupation as surgeon was 5-40 years. Specialties were urology, orthopedics, plastic surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, ophthalmic surgery, ear-nose-throat surgery, cardiovascular, general surgery, and neurosurgery. The results generally denote that the surgeons are aware of the occupational risk of HIV infection. Current knowledge about transmission risk evaluation, existence of prevention prophylaxis, advance in HIV treatment and prolonged life expectancy were less than expected. Correspondingly, half of the surgeons were reluctant to touch the patients. For each question, there was no statistically important difference between the answers of the surgeons according to position (residency doctor or specialist) (p> 0.05). There was also no statistically important difference between the answers of the surgeons according to age and duration of occupation (p> 0.05). Any significant correlation was not detected when age and duration of occupation were evaluated according to the total number of true answers (p= 0.802, r= -0.028 and p= 0.831, r= 0.023 respectively) Conclusion: The survey revealed the need for a meeting to be held with the surgeons of our hospital regarding the current status of the disease in the near future.