Back to Search
Start Over
The Potential Impact of a Hepatitis C Vaccine for People Who Inject Drugs: Is a Vaccine Needed in the Age of Direct-Acting Antivirals?
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 11, Iss 5, p e0156213 (2016), Stone, J, Martin, N, Hickman, M, Hellard, M, Scott, N, McBryde, E, Drummer, H & Vickerman, P 2016, ' The Potential Impact of a Hepatitis C Vaccine for People Who Inject Drugs : Is a Vaccine Needed in the Age of Direct-Acting Antivirals? ', PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 5, e0156213 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156213
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science, 2016.
-
Abstract
- Background & Aims The advent of highly effective hepatitis C (HCV) treatments has questioned the need for a vaccine to control HCV amongst people who inject drugs (PWID). However, high treatment costs and ongoing reinfection risk suggest it could still play a role. We compared the impact of HCV vaccination amongst PWID against providing HCV treatment. Methods Dynamic HCV vaccination and treatment models among PWID were used to determine the vaccination and treatment rates required to reduce chronic HCV prevalence or incidence in the UK over 20 or 40 years. Projections considered a low (50% protection for 5 years), moderate (70% protection for 10 years) or high (90% protection for 20 years) efficacy vaccine. Sensitivities to various parameters were examined. Results To halve chronic HCV prevalence over 40 years, the low, moderate and high efficacy vaccines required annual vaccination rates (coverage after 20 years) of 162 (72%), 77 (56%) and 44 (38%) per 1000 PWID, respectively. These vaccination rates were 16, 7.6 and 4.4 times greater than corresponding treatment rates. To halve prevalence over 20 years nearly doubled these vaccination rates (moderate and high efficacy vaccines only) and the vaccination-to-treatment ratio increased by 20%. For all scenarios considered, required annual vaccination rates and vaccination-to-treatment ratios were at least a third lower to reduce incidence than prevalence. Baseline HCV prevalence had little effect on the vaccine’s impact on prevalence or incidence, but substantially affected the vaccination-to-treatment ratios. Behavioural risk heterogeneity only had an effect if we assumed no transitions between high and low risk states and vaccinations were targeted or if PWID were high risk for their first year. Conclusions Achievable coverage levels of a low efficacy prophylactic HCV vaccine could greatly reduce HCV transmission amongst PWID. Current high treatment costs ensure vaccination could still be an important intervention option.
- Subjects :
- RNA viruses
Hepatitis C vaccine
Time Factors
Hepacivirus
lcsh:Medicine
medicine.disease_cause
0302 clinical medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Prevalence
Medicine
Public and Occupational Health
030212 general & internal medicine
lcsh:Science
Booster Doses
Substance Abuse, Intravenous
Immune Response
Pathology and laboratory medicine
Vaccines
Multidisciplinary
biology
Hepatitis C virus
Pharmaceutics
Incidence (epidemiology)
Mortality rate
Incidence
Vaccination
Hepatitis C
Medical microbiology
Vaccination and Immunization
3. Good health
Treatment Outcome
Viruses
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Pathogens
Research Article
Viral Hepatitis Vaccines
Death Rates
Immunology
Microbiology
Antiviral Agents
03 medical and health sciences
Pharmacotherapy
Population Metrics
Drug Therapy
Environmental health
Humans
Demography
Flaviviruses
Population Biology
business.industry
lcsh:R
Organisms
Viral pathogens
Immunity
Biology and Life Sciences
Hepatitis C, Chronic
Models, Theoretical
biology.organism_classification
medicine.disease
Hepatitis viruses
United Kingdom
Microbial pathogens
People and Places
lcsh:Q
Preventive Medicine
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLoS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....20073a3073518ff1eb08296e0d8f0a96