Back to Search Start Over

Tepotinib plus gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer with MET overexpression or MET amplification and acquired resistance to previous EGFR inhibitor (INSIGHT study): an open-label, phase 1b/2, multicentre, randomised trial

Authors :
Yi-Long Wu
Ying Cheng
Jianying Zhou
Shun Lu
Yiping Zhang
Jun Zhao
Dong-Wan Kim
Ross Andrew Soo
Sang-We Kim
Hongming Pan
Yuh-Min Chen
Chih-Feng Chian
Xiaoqing Liu
Daniel Shao Weng Tan
Rolf Bruns
Josef Straub
Andreas Johne
Jürgen Scheele
Keunchil Park
James Chih-Hsin Yang
Zhe Liu
Xi Chen
Mengzhao Wang
Shiying Yu
Helong Zhang
Jian Fang
Wei Li
Chih-Hsin Yang
Gee-Chen Chang
Te-Chun Hsia
Cheng-Ta Yang
Chin-Chou Wang
Byoung Chul Cho
Ki Hyeong Lee
Young-Chul Kim
Ho Jung An
In Sook Woo
Jae Yong Cho
Sang Won Shin
Jong-Seok Lee
Joo-Hang Kim
Seung Soo Yoo
Terufumi Kato
Naofumi Shinagawa
Shao Weng Daniel Tan
Lynette Si-Mien Ngo
Kananathan Ratnavelu
Azura Rozila Ahmad
Chong Kin Liam
Filippo de Marinis
Pierfrancesco Tassone
Amelia Insa Molla
Antonio Calles Blanco
Martin Emilio Lazaro Quintela
Enriqueta Felip Font
Anne-Marie Dingemans
Lynne Bui
Source :
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 8:1132-1143
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Summary Background We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tepotinib, a potent and highly selective oral MET inhibitor, plus gefitinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET overexpression (immunohistochemistry [IHC]2+ or IHC3+) or MET amplification having acquired resistance to EGFR inhibition. Methods In this open-label, phase 1b/2, multicentre, randomised trial (the INSIGHT study), we enrolled adult patients (≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, from academic medical centres and community clinics in six Asian countries. In phase 1b, patients received oral tepotinib 300 mg or 500 mg plus gefitinib 250 mg once daily. In phase 2, patients with EGFR-mutant, T790M-negative NSCLC MET overexpression or MET amplification were randomly assigned (initially in a 1:1 ratio and then 2:1 following a protocol amendment) to tepotinib plus gefitinib at the recommended phase 2 dose or to standard platinum doublet chemotherapy. Randomisation was done centrally via an interactive voice-response system. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Subgroup analyses were preplanned in patients with high MET overexpression (IHC3+) or MET amplification (mean gene copy number ≥5 or MET to centromere of chromosome 7 ratio ≥2). Efficacy and patient characteristics were assessed on an intention-to-treat basis and safety was assessed for all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Low recruitment led to early termination of phase 2, so all analyses are considered to be exploratory. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01982955 , and the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database, Eudra-CT 2016-001604-28. Findings From Dec 23, 2013, to May 25, 2017, 18 patients were enrolled in phase 1b (n=6 in the 300 mg tepotinib group; n=12 in the 500 mg tepotinib group) and 55 patients in phase 2 (n=31 in the tepotinib plus gefitinib group; n=24 in the chemotherapy group). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in phase 1b, so tepotinib 500 mg was used as the recommended phase 2 dose. In phase 2, survival outcomes were similar between groups: median PFS was 4·9 months in the tepotinib plus gefitinib group (90% CI 3·9–6·9) versus 4·4 months in the chemotherapy group (90% CI 4·2–6·8; hazard ratio [HR] 0·67, 90% CI 0·35–1·28). Median OS was 17·3 months in the tepotinib plus gefitinib group (12·1–37·3) versus 18·7 months in the chemotherapy group (15·9–20·7; HR 0·69, 0·34–1·41). PFS and OS were longer with tepotinib plus gefitinib than with chemotherapy in patients with high (IHC3+) MET overexpression (n=34; median PFS 8·3 months [4·1–16·6] vs 4·4 months [4·1–6·8]; HR 0·35, 0·17–0·74; median OS 37·3 months [90% CI 24·2–37·3] vs 17·9 months [12·0–20·7]; HR 0·33, 0·14–0·76) or MET amplification (n=19; median PFS 16·6 months [8·3–not estimable] vs 4·2 months [1·4–7·0]; HR 0·13, 0·04–0·43; median OS 37·3 months [90% CI not estimable] vs 13·1 months [3·25–not estimable]; HR 0·08, 0·01–0·51). The most frequent treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were increased amylase (5 [16%] of 31 patients) and lipase (4 [13%]) concentrations in the tepotinib plus gefitinib group and anaemia (7 [30%] of 23 patients) and decreased neutrophil count (3 [13%]) in the chemotherapy group. Interpretation Despite early study termination, in a preplanned subgroup analysis, our findings suggest improved anti activity for tepotinib plus gefitinib compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and MET amplification, warranting further exploration. Funding Merck KGaA.

Details

ISSN :
22132600
Volume :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....20318c347afef7410fb0f11cfa50f770
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30154-5