Back to Search
Start Over
Contrast-enhanced CT in determining resectability in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the positive predictive values of CT
- Source :
- European radiology, 27(8), 3408-3435. Springer Verlag, European Radiology
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Objective To obtain a summary positive predictive value (sPPV) of contrast-enhanced CT in determining resectability. Methods The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from JAN2005 to DEC2015 were searched and checked for inclusion criteria. Data on study design, patient characteristics, imaging techniques, image evaluation, reference standard, time interval between CT and reference standard, and data on resectability/unresectablity were extracted by two reviewers. We used a fixed-effects or random-effects approach to obtain sPPV for resectability. Several subgroups were defined: 1) bolus-triggering versus fixed-timing; 2) pancreatic and portal phases versus portal phase alone; 3) all criteria (liver metastases/lymphnode involvement/local advanced/vascular invasion) versus only vascular invasion as criteria for unresectability. Results Twenty-nine articles were included (2171 patients). Most studies were performed in multicentre settings, initiated by the department of radiology and retrospectively performed. The I2-value was 68%, indicating heterogeneity of data. The sPPV was 81% (95%CI: 75-86%). False positives were mostly liver, peritoneal, or lymphnode metastases. Bolus-triggering had a slightly higher sPPV compared to fixed-timing, 87% (95%CI: 81-91%) versus 78% (95%CI: 66-86%) (p = 0.077). No differences were observed in other subgroups. Conclusions This meta-analysis showed a sPPV of 81% for predicting resectability by CT, meaning that 19% of patients falsely undergo surgical exploration. Key points • Predicting resectability of pancreatic cancer by CT is 81% (95%CI: 75-86%). • The percentage of patients falsely undergoing surgical exploration is 19%. • The false positives are liver metastases, peritoneal metastases, or lymph node metastases Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4708-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Enhanced ct
Contrast Media
Computed tomography
Unnecessary Procedures
Sensitivity and Specificity
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
Computed Tomography
0302 clinical medicine
Predictive Value of Tests
mental disorders
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
In patient
Pancreatic carcinoma
Retrospective Studies
Positive Predictive Value
Neuroradiology
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Liver Neoplasms
General Medicine
Predictive value
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Oncology
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Lymphatic Metastasis
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Meta-analysis
Surgery
Systematic Review
Radiology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14321084 and 09387994
- Volume :
- 27
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Radiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2042916d2425083aa305956659cba5bc
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4708-5