Back to Search Start Over

Advancing the science of health professions education through a shared understanding of terminology: a content analysis of terms for 'faculty'

Authors :
Lambert Schuwirth
Anique Atherley
Steven J. Durning
Dujeepa D. Samarasekera
Pim W. Teunissen
Wendy Hu
Jennifer J. Cleland
Hiroshi Nishigori
Eric S. Holmboe
Lauren A. Maggio
Susan van Schalkwyk
RS: SHE - R1 - Research (OvO)
Onderwijsontw & Onderwijsresearch
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D)
Source :
Perspectives on Medical Education, Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(1), 22-27. Springer, Cham, Teunissen, P W, Atherley, A, Cleland, J J, Holmboe, E, Hu, W C Y, Durning, S J, Nishigori, H, Samarasekera, D D, Schuwirth, L, van Schalkwyk, S & Maggio, L A 2022, ' Advancing the science of health professions education through a shared understanding of terminology: a content analysis of terms for “faculty” ', Perspectives on Medical Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 22-27 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00683-8, Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(1), 22-27. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction Health professions educators risk misunderstandings where terms and concepts are not clearly defined, hampering the field’s progress. This risk is especially pronounced with ambiguity in describing roles. This study explores the variety of terms used by researchers and educators to describe “faculty”, with the aim to facilitate definitional clarity, and create a shared terminology and approach to describing this term. Methods The authors analyzed journal article abstracts to identify the specific words and phrases used to describe individuals or groups of people referred to as faculty. To identify abstracts, PubMed articles indexed with the Medical Subject Heading “faculty” published between 2007 and 2017 were retrieved. Authors iteratively extracted data and used content analysis to identify patterns and themes. Results A total of 5,436 citations were retrieved, of which 3,354 were deemed eligible. Based on a sample of 594 abstracts (17.7%), we found 279 unique terms. The most commonly used terms accounted for approximately one-third of the sample and included faculty or faculty member/s (n = 252; 26.4%); teacher/s (n = 59; 6.2%) and medical educator/s (n = 26; 2.7%) were also well represented. Content analysis highlighted that the different descriptors authors used referred to four role types: healthcare (e.g., doctor, physician), education (e.g., educator, teacher), academia (e.g., professor), and/or relationship to the learner (e.g., mentor). Discussion Faculty are described using a wide variety of terms, which can be linked to four role descriptions. The authors propose a template for researchers and educators who want to refer to faculty in their papers. This is important to advance the field and increase readers’ assessment of transferability. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00683-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22122761
Volume :
11
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Perspectives on Medical Education
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....20601b6f749d02e5646256be75042e1a