Back to Search Start Over

Effect of a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt versus a lumbar support on walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial

Authors :
Carlo Ammendolia
Pierre Côté
Claire Bombardier
Danielle Southerst
Y. Raja Rampersaud
Gillian A. Hawker
Michael Schneider
Aksa Ahmed
Source :
The Spine Journal. 19:386-394
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can impair blood flow to the spinal nerves giving rise to neurogenic claudication and limited walking ability. Reducing lumbar lordosis can increases the volume of the spinal canal and reduce neuroischemia. We developed a prototype LSS belt aimed at reducing lumbar lordosis while walking. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the short-term effectiveness of a prototype LSS belt compared to a lumbar support in improving walking ability in patients with degenerative LSS. STUDY DESIGN This was a two-arm, double-blinded (participant and assessor) randomized controlled trial. PATIENT SAMPLE We recruited 104 participants aged 50 years or older with neurogenic claudication, imaging confirmed degenerative LSS, and limited walking ability. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary measure was walking distance measured by the self-paced walking test (SPWT) and the primary outcome was the difference in proportions among participants in both groups who achieved at least a 30% improvement in walking distance from baseline using relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. METHODS Within 1 week of a baseline SPWT, participants randomized to the prototype LSS belt group (n=52) and those randomized to the lumbar support group (n=52) performed a SPWT that was conducted by a blinded assessor. The Arthritis Society funded this study ($365,000 CAN) with salary support for principal investigator funded by the Canadian Chiropractic Research Foundation ($500,000 CAN for 5 years). RESULTS Both groups showed significant improvement in walking distance, but there was no significant difference between groups. The mean group difference in walking distance was −74 m (95% CI: −282.8 to 134.8, p=.49). In total, 62% of participants wearing the prototype LSS belt and 82% of participants wearing the lumbar support achieved at least 30% improvement in walking distance (relative risk, 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5–1.3, p=.43). CONCLUSIONS A prototype LSS belt demonstrated significant improvement in walking ability in degenerative LSS but was no better than a lumbar support.

Details

ISSN :
15299430
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Spine Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2071f3d21c8b2bd6ac919a269a75538c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.012