Back to Search Start Over

Association of N-Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Insights from the Phase III GRIPHON Study

Authors :
Marius M. Hoeper
Victor F. Tapson
Irene M. Lang
Olivier Sitbon
Gérald Simonneau
Lewis J. Rubin
Kelly Chin
Sean Gaine
Vallerie V. McLaughlin
R Preiss
Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani
Nazzareno Galiè
Lilla Di Scala
Richard N. Channick
Chin K.M.
Rubin L.J.
Channick R.
Di Scala L.
Gaine S.
Galie N.
Ghofrani H.-A.
Hoeper M.M.
Lang I.M.
McLaughlin V.V.
Preiss R.
Simonneau G.
Sitbon O.
Tapson V.F.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) levels are included in the multiparametric risk assessment approach for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) outlined in PAH guidelines. However, data supporting the use of NT-proBNP risk thresholds in assessing prognosis in PAH are limited. The GRIPHON trial (Prostacyclin [PGI 2 ] Receptor Agonist In Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension) provides an opportunity to assess the prognostic value of NT-proBNP thresholds in a controlled clinical trial and to evaluate the response to selexipag according to these thresholds. Methods: The event-driven GRIPHON trial randomly assigned patients to selexipag or placebo. NT-proBNP was measured at regular intervals in GRIPHON. Here, patients were categorized post hoc into low, medium, and high NT-proBNP subgroups according to 2 independent sets of thresholds: (1) baseline tertiles: 1165 ng/L; and (2) 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines cutoffs: 1400 ng/L. Hazard ratios (selexipag versus placebo) with 95% CIs were calculated for the primary end point (composite morbidity/mortality events) by NT-proBNP category at baseline using Cox proportional-hazards models, and at any time during the exposure period using a time-dependent Cox model. Results: With both thresholds, baseline and follow-up NT-proBNP categories were highly prognostic for future morbidity/mortality events during the study ( P P values 0.20 and 0.007 in the baseline and time-dependent analyses). Conclusions: These analyses further establish the prognostic relevance of NT-proBNP levels in PAH and provide first evidence for the association of NT-proBNP level and treatment response. Using 2 similar sets of thresholds, these analyses support the relevance of the low, medium, and high NT-proBNP categories as part of the multiparametric risk assessment approach outlined in the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of PAH patients. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01106014.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....215cfee6b94e509b275d3207dee65ba8