Back to Search Start Over

Overload depending on driving experience and situation complexity: Which strategies faced with a pedestrian crossing?

Authors :
Edith Galy
Catherine Berthelon
Julie Paxion
Laboratoire Mécanismes d'Accidents (IFSTTAR/TS2/LMA)
Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux (IFSTTAR)
Centre de Recherche en Psychologie de la Connaissance, du Langage et de l'Émotion (PsyCLÉ)
Aix Marseille Université (AMU)
Source :
Applied Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics, Elsevier, 2015, pp.343-349. ⟨10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.014⟩
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2015.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the influence of situation complexity and driving experience on subjective workload and driving performance, and the less costly and the most effective strategies faced with a hazard pedestrian crossing. Four groups of young drivers (15 traditionally trained novices, 12 early-trained novices, 15 with three years of experience and 15 with a minimum of five years of experience) were randomly assigned to three situations (simple, moderately complex and very complex) including unexpected pedestrian crossings, in a driving simulator. The subjective workload was collected by the NASA-TLX questionnaire after each situation. The main results confirmed that the situation complexity and the lack of experience increased the subjective workload. Moreover, the subjective workload, the avoidance strategies and the reaction times influenced the number of collisions depending on situation complexity and driving experience. These results must be taken into account to target the prevention actions.

Details

ISSN :
00036870
Volume :
51
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Applied Ergonomics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....216ae24a59ca1af5bdedc98cf3d5515d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.014