Back to Search Start Over

Quantifying Procedural Pain Associated with Office Gynecologic Tract Sampling Methods

Authors :
Maureen A. Lemens
Shannon K. Laughlin-Tommaso
Matthew R. Hopkins
Nicolas Wentzensen
Lois J. Mc Guire
Mark E. Sherman
Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez
Amy L. Weaver
Emily Shields
Lisa J. Ahlberg
Megan A. Clarke
Madhu Bagaria
A.L. VanOosten
Source :
Gynecol Oncol
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Emerging technologies may enable detection of endometrial cancer with methods that are less invasive than standard biopsy methods. This study compares patient pain scores among 3 office gynecologic tract sampling methods and explores their potential determinants. METHODS: A prospective study including 3 sampling methods (tampon, Tao brush (TB), endometrial biopsy (EB)) was conducted between December 2015 and August 2017 and included women ≥45 years of age presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding, or thickened endometrial stripe. Patients rated pain after each sampling procedure using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Of 428 enrolled, 190 (44.39%) patients underwent all 3 sampling methods and reported a VAS score for each. Nearly half were postmenopausal (n=93, 48.9%); the majority were parous (172, 90.5%) of which 87.8% had at least one vaginal delivery. Among the 190 patients, the median (IQR) pain score was significantly lower for sampling via tampon (0 [0, 2]) compared to TB (28 [12, 52]) or EB (32 [15, 60]) (both p

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gynecol Oncol
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....21be1aca59e44553255121e4d6ba3f6d