Back to Search
Start Over
Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 12, p e0226527 (2019), PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0226527
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2019.
-
Abstract
- DNA-based identification through the use of metabarcoding has been proposed as the next step in the monitoring of biological communities, such as those assessed under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Advances have been made in the field of metabarcoding, but challenges remain when using complex samples. Uneven biomass distributions, preferential amplification and reference database deficiencies can all lead to discrepancies between morphological and DNA-based taxa lists. The effects of different taxonomic groups on these issues remain understudied. By metabarcoding WFD monitoring samples, we analyzed six different taxonomic groups of freshwater organisms, both separately and combined. Identifications based on metabarcoding data were compared directly to morphological assessments performed under the WFD. The diversity of taxa for both morphological and DNA-based assessments was similar, although large differences were observed in some samples. The overlap between the two taxon lists was 56.8% on average across all taxa, and was highest for Crustacea, Heteroptera, and Coleoptera, and lowest for Annelida and Mollusca. Taxonomic sorting in six basic groups before DNA extraction and amplification improved taxon recovery by 46.5%. The impact on ecological quality ratio (EQR) scoring was considerable when replacing morphology with DNA-based identifications, but there was a high correlation when only replacing a single taxonomic group with molecular data. Different taxonomic groups provide their own challenges and benefits. Some groups might benefit from a more consistent and robust method of identification. Others present difficulties in molecular processing, due to uneven biomass distributions, large genetic diversity or shortcomings of the reference database. Sorting samples into basic taxonomic groups that require little taxonomic knowledge greatly improves the recovery of taxa with metabarcoding. Current standards for EQR monitoring may not be easily replaced completely with molecular strategies, but the effectiveness of molecular methods opens up the way for a paradigm shift in biomonitoring.
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
Aquatic Organisms
Databases, Factual
Annelida
Ecological Parameter Monitoring
Fresh Water
Artificial Gene Amplification and Extension
01 natural sciences
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Database and Informatics Methods
Crustacea
Water Quality
Taxonomic rank
Annelids
DNA extraction
Data Management
0303 health sciences
Mites
Multidisciplinary
Eukaryota
Malacology
Biodiversity
Biota
Water Framework Directive
Medicine
Taxonomy (biology)
Sequence Analysis
Research Article
Computer and Information Sciences
Arthropoda
Bioinformatics
Science
macroinvertebrates
Sequence Databases
Biology
Research and Analysis Methods
010603 evolutionary biology
03 medical and health sciences
Extraction techniques
Animals
DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic
Molecular Biology Techniques
Molecular Biology
030304 developmental biology
Invertebrate
Taxonomy
Genetic diversity
Organisms
Reproducibility of Results
Biology and Life Sciences
DNA
Molluscs
Invertebrates
Taxon
Biological Databases
Evolutionary biology
Mollusca
metabarcoding
Reference database
Zoology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLoS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....234f7cbb54b7e673c43a1a22b99abc0a