Back to Search Start Over

What should selective cardiometabolic prevention programmes in European primary care look like? A consensus-based design by the SPIMEU group

Authors :
Kral, Norbert
de Waard, Anne-Karien M.
Schellevis, Francois G.
Korevaar, Joke C.
Lionis, Christos
Carlsson, Axel C
Sönderlund, Anders Larrabee
Söndergaard, Jens
Larsen, Lars Bruun
Hollander, Monika
Thilsing, Trine
Angelaki, Agapi
de Wit, Niek J.
Seifert, Bohumil
APH - Quality of Care
APH - Aging & Later Life
Academic Medical Center
Source :
Král, N, de Waard, A K M, Schellevis, F G, Korevaar, J C, Lionis, C, Carlsson, A C, Sønderlund, A L, Søndergaard, J, Larsen, L B, Hollander, M, Thilsing, T, Angelaki, A, de Wit, N J & Seifert, B 2019, ' What should selective cardiometabolic prevention programmes in European primary care look like? A consensus-based design by the SPIMEU group ', European Journal of General Practice, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 101-108 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2019.1641195, European Journal of General Practice, Vol 25, Iss 3, Pp 101-108 (2019), European Journal of General Practice, 25(3), 101-108, European journal of general practice, 25(3), 101-108. Taylor and Francis Ltd., European Journal of General Practice, 25(3), 101. Informa Healthcare, The European Journal of General Practice
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Selective prevention of cardiometabolic diseases (CMD)—that is, preventive measures specifically targeting the high-risk population—may represent the most effective approach for mitigating rising CMD rates. Objectives: To develop a universal concept of selective CMD prevention that can guide implementation within European primary care. Methods: Initially, 32 statements covering different aspects of selective CMD prevention programmes were identified based on a synthesis of evidence from two systematic literature reviews and surveys conducted within the SPIMEU project. The Rand/UCLA appropriateness method (RAM) was used to find consensus on these statements among an international panel consisting of 14 experts. Before the consensus meeting, statements were rated by the experts in a first round. In the next step, during a face-to-face meeting, experts were provided with the results of the first rating and were then invited to discuss and rescore the statements in a second round. Results: In the outcome of the RAM procedure, 28 of 31 statements were considered appropriate and three were rated uncertain. The panel deleted one statement. Selective CMD prevention was considered an effective approach for preventing CMD and a proactive approach was regarded as more effective compared to case-finding alone. The most efficient method to implement selective CMD prevention systematically in primary care relies on a stepwise approach: initial risk assessment followed by interventions if indicated. Conclusion: The final set of statements represents the key characteristics of selective CMD prevention and can serve as a guide for implementing selective prevention actions in European primary care.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13814788
Volume :
25
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European journal of general practice
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....239f84e3f638b97603f581e4bca6768d