Data from Correlation Between Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Gene Aberrations and Prognosis of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Whether isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene aberrations affected prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate their prognostic value.Experimental Design: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Chinese databases were searched to identify studies exploring how IDH gene aberrations affected AML outcome. Pooled HRs and relative risks (RR) were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results: Thirty-three reports were included. IDH mutations seemed not to affect overall survival (OS: HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.89–1.23) and event-free survival (EFS: HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80–1.18) when considered as a single factor, but improved accumulative incidence of relapse (CIR: HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.18–1.76) in patients with intermediate-risk karyotypes (IR-AML). However, IDH1 mutation conferred worse OS (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05–1.31) and EFS (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07–1.56), especially in patients with normal cytogenetics (OS: HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01–1.46; EFS: HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.23–1.98). Prognosis of the IDH1 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs11554137 was also poor (OS: HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03–1.75). IDH2 mutation improved OS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66–0.93), particularly in IR-AML patients (OS: HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49–0.86). The IDH2 (R140) mutation was associated with better OS among younger cases (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49–0.82). Treatment outcome was poor [RR for complete remission rates in IDH1 mutation: 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02–1.44; IDH2 (R172) mutation: 2.14; 95% CI, 1.61–2.85].Conclusions: Various subtypes of IDH mutations might contribute to different prognosis and be allowed to stratify IR-AML further. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4511–22. ©2017 AACR.