Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Insulin Pump Bolus Calculators Reveals Wide Variation in Dose Recommendations

Authors :
Christine Ferrara-Cook
Jeanne Buchanan
Jenise C. Wong
Saleh Adi
Jennifer A Zabinsky
Source :
Journal of diabetes science and technology, vol 15, iss 6, J Diabetes Sci Technol
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
eScholarship, University of California, 2021.

Abstract

Background: The introduction of insulin pumps with bolus calculators (BCs) has improved glycemic outcomes and quality of life for those with type 1 diabetes. Despite the increased reliance on BCs, the formulas used to derive recommended boluses are not standardized. Our objective was to examine whether recommendations from different pump BCs vary significantly for identical clinical scenarios. Methods: Three commercially available insulin pump BCs were programmed with identical settings and then presented with combinations of blood glucose (BG) and carbohydrates (CHOs) to generate a 4-unit bolus. At one- and two-hour time points, while there was insulin-on-board (IOB) present, we simulated various BG and CHO scenarios in order to compare BC-recommended doses. Results: Differences in suggested doses were noted between BCs, as well as within the same brand. The greatest variation was apparent when BG was below target. Doses suggested by one BC varied depending on whether the IOB resulted from a previous dose given for BG or CHO, while the other two BCs adjusted for total IOB regardless of the source. Conclusions: In this simulation study, there were large differences in recommended doses between BCs due to the unique way each manufacturer incorporates IOB into their formulas as well as the pharmacokinetics used to derive the IOB amount. Providers should be aware that identical pump settings will result in a different dose recommendation for each pump brand and advise patients accordingly.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of diabetes science and technology, vol 15, iss 6, J Diabetes Sci Technol
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....24f8abf7a7273c41326714ce7e7591f4