Back to Search Start Over

Direct restoration of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: post or no post at all?

Authors :
Michael Naumann
Maria Bruhnke
Martin Rosentritt
Roland Frankenberger
Kerstin Bitter
Guido Sterzenbach
Manja von Stein-Lausnitz
Source :
Clinical Oral Investigations. 23:381-389
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.

Abstract

The aim of this ex-vivo study was to evaluate the impact of cavity size and glass-fiber post (GFP) placement on the load capability of endodontically treated maxillary incisors directly restored with resin composite. Ninety-six extracted human maxillary central incisors were endodontically treated and distributed to four groups (n = 24): access cavity (A), access cavity and uni-proximal class III cavity (U), access cavity and bi-proximal class III cavity (B), and decoronated tooth (D). Specimens were restored with resin composite, and 12 specimen of each group received an adhesively placed glass-fiber post (P). Prior to linear loading, specimens were exposed to thermo-mechanical loading (TCML). Statistical analysis was performed using log-rank test after TCML, Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test to compare load capabilities (Fmax). Significantly more failures occurred in group D for specimens without GFP during TCML (p = 0.001). Fmax (mean (SD) in N was (A) 513 (124), (AP) 554 (201), (U) 438 (171), (UP) 537 (232) (B) 483 (219), (BP) 536 (281), D 143 (181), and DP 500 (331), and differed significantly among groups (p = 0.003). Pair-wise comparison revealed lower Fmax values for group D compared to all other groups (p

Details

ISSN :
14363771 and 14326981
Volume :
23
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Oral Investigations
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2558a8f39093f509517d7fd08dee1329
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2446-6