Back to Search Start Over

Binding of Anti-Double Stranded (ds) DNA-Positive Sera to Denatured (d) DNA and Synthetic Poly[dA-dT] x Poly[dA-dT] Double Stranded Copolymer in an ELISA Format

Authors :
Matko Marušić
Malenica B
Nada Čikeš
Markeljević J
A. Krstulovic
Drago Batinić
M. Bozicevic
D. Bosnic
M. Sentic
Source :
Scopus-Elsevier
Publication Year :
1996
Publisher :
Kooperation de Gruyter, 1996.

Abstract

Using an ELISA assay anti-nuclear antibody-positive sera from 300 patients with various immune-related diseases and 64 anti-nuclear antibody-negative sera were analysed for binding to S1-nuclease-treated double stranded (ds) DNA. In addition, the pattern of reactivity of 50 selected anti-dsDNA-positive sera was established using denatured (d) DNA and poly[dA-dT] X poly[dA-dT] double-stranded alternating copolymer (dAT) as additional DNA antigens. None of the 64 anti-nuclear antibody-negative sera and 76 of the 300 anti-nuclear antibody-positive sera (25%) were anti-dsDNA-positive. Of the anti-nuclear antibody-positive and anti-dsDNA-positive sera, 48 (63%) were from systemic lupus erythematosus patients, and 7 (9%) from rheumatoid arthritis patients, whereas 21 patients (27.6%) suffered from various immune and non-immune related diseases. Anti-dsDNA-positive reactivity was highly correlated with dDNA and dAT reactivity (r = 0.906, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.93, p < 0.0001, respectively). Although the majority of the 50 selected (37 systemic lupus erythematosus and 13 non-systemic lupus erythematosus) anti-dsDNA-positive sera concomitantly bound to both additional antigens, 7 of these (14%) did not bind to dAT, and 2 (4%) did not bind to dDNA. Anti-dsDNA-positive sera (n = 37) showed a similar pattern, in which 8.1% and 2.7% of sera did not bind to dAT and to dDNA, respectively. In contrast, anti-dsDNA-negative sera from various immune-related diseases bound either ssDNA (12.5%) or dDNA and dAT (12.5%). These data suggest that dsDNA and dAT-based assays detect similar but not identical specificities in the sera of patients suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus and in a proportion of non-systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scopus-Elsevier
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....256809307d70d3517049ac9f8d4ad5a7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.18452/10911