Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcomes of Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfer before and after Endometrial Receptivity Analysis in Identical Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure
- Source :
- Fertility & Reproduction, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 35-41 (2021)
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- World Scientific Publishing, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Background: The clinical value of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) tests for recurrent implantation failure (RIF) cases is still unclear. The aim of this study is to clarify the efficacy of ERA leading to personalization of the day of embryo transfer (ET) in RIF patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed for 94 patients with RIF who underwent ERA between July 2015 and December 2019. Pregnancy outcomes in a previous vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (previous VBT) and a personalized vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (pVBT) in identical patients were compared. The details of each pVBT were further analyzed between patients in a non-displaced group, which indicated “receptive” cases in ERA results and those who were in the displaced group, which indicated “non-receptive” cases. Results: When the pregnancy rate, both per patient and per transfer cycle, of previous VBT and pVBT were compared, a significant increase in pVBT was observed between the two methods (5.3% vs. 62.8%, 4.4% vs. 47.9%, respectively). The pregnancy rates, implantation rates, and clinical pregnancy rates of the first pVBT were significantly higher in the displaced group than the non-displaced group. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate of the displaced group tended to be higher compared to that of the non-displaced group in the first pVBT, although the difference was not statistically significant (51.0% vs. 31.1%, [Formula: see text] = 0.06). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that pVBT guided by ERA tests may improve pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients whose window of implantation (WOI) is displaced, and its effect may be more pronounced at the first pVBT. The displacement of WOI may be considered to be one of the causes of RIF, and its adjustment may contribute to the improvement of pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
Gynecology
medicine.medical_specialty
recurrent implantation failure (rif)
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine
endometrial receptivity analysis (era)
QH471-489
business.industry
Reproduction
Blastocyst Transfer
vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (vbt)
window of implantation (woi)
personalized vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (pvbt)
Embryo transfer
03 medical and health sciences
030104 developmental biology
0302 clinical medicine
Implantation failure
Clinical value
Medicine
Endometrial receptivity
business
Pregnancy outcomes
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 26613174 and 26613182
- Volume :
- 3
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Fertility & Reproduction
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2658d0793d8bf4ff9d27162a944b2f34