Back to Search Start Over

Wind tunnel testing of a swept tip shape and comparison with multi-fidelity aerodynamic simulations

Authors :
Anders Smærup Olsen
Néstor Ramos-García
Robert Flemming Mikkelsen
Georg Pirrung
Thanasis K. Barlas
Mac Gaunaa
Sergio González Horcas
Source :
Wind Energy Science, Vol 6, Pp 1311-1324 (2021), Barlas, T, Pirrung, G R, Ramos-García, N, Horcas, S G, Mikkelsen, R F, Olsen, A S & Gaunaa, M 2021, ' Wind tunnel testing of a swept tip shape and comparison with multi-fidelity aerodynamic simulations ', Wind Energy Science, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1311-1324 . https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1311-2021
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Copernicus Publications, 2021.

Abstract

One promising design solution for increasing the efficiency of modern horizontal axis wind turbines is the installation of curved tip extensions. However, introducing such complex geometries may move traditional aerodynamic models based on Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory out of their range of applicability. This motivated the present work, where a swept tip shape is investigated by means of both experimental and numerical tests. The latter group accounted for a wide variety of aerodynamic models, allowing to highlight the capabilities and limitations of each of them in a relative manner. The considered swept tip shape is the result of a design optimization, focusing on locally maximizing power performance within load constraints. For the experimental tests, the tip model is instrumented with spanwise bands of pressure sensors and is tested in the Poul la Cour wind tunnel at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU). The methods used for the numerical tests consisted of a blade element model, a near-wake model, lifting-line free-wake models, and a fully resolved Navier- Stokes solver. The comparison of the numerical and the experimental tests results is performed for a given range of angles of attack and wind speeds, which is representative of the expected conditions in operation. Results show that the blade element model cannot predict the measured normal force coefficients, but the other methods are generally in good agreement with the measurements in attached flow. Flow visualization and pressure distribution compare well with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. The agreement in the clean case is better than in the tripped case, indicating an aggressive tripping of the flow in the measurements. Some uncertainties regarding the effect of the boundary layer at the inboard tunnel wall and the post stall behavior remain.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23667451 and 23667443
Volume :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Wind Energy Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....269f6726abdf48f27ab2dbe851c862d7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1311-2021