Back to Search Start Over

Clinical experience of Kock pouchcontinent urinary diversion

Authors :
Jue-Hawn Yin
Ming-Tsun Chen
Jong-Khing Huang
Kuang-Kuo Chen
Shinn-Nan Lin
Luke S. Chang
Source :
Urology. 35:317-320
Publication Year :
1990
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 1990.

Abstract

Kock continent ileal reservoir for urinary diversion was performed in 53 patients with invasive bladder cancer (52) or neurogenic bladder (1). The postoperative follow-up period was from six to thirty-nine months. The clinical results showed no metabolic disturbance of blood electrolytes or acidity. Prolapse of efferent nipple valve developed in 4 patients (7.6%); and 2 underwent revisional surgery with a good result. Another 4 patients (7.6%) suffered from poor continence and relatively frequent catheterization to empty the pouch was necessary to prevent urine leakage through the stoma. Urodynamic study of the Kock pouch in these 4 patients showed a short functional nipple valve length and small pouch capacity. The other 45 patients (84.8%) had good continence. Urodynamic study of the pouch in 20 patients showed low pressure (mean of 13.3 cm H2O) in the pouch and high pressure (mean of 72.1 cm H2O) at the efferent nipple valve. Three patients had unilateral hydronephrosis in the follow-up intravenous urography. Corrective surgery for stenosis at the right ureteroileal anastomosis was done in 1 patient with normalization of the upper urinary tract afterward. The other 2 patients were managed by close observation for the mild hydronephrosis. Symptomatic bacteriuria developed in only 3 patients (5.7%) and responded well to antibiotic management. Reservoirography demonstrated no reflux into the upper urinary tract in all the follow-up patients. There was no significant change of the renal function at twenty-four months after operation detected by radionuclide (131I-Hippuran) renal functional study. All patients were satisfied with Kock urinary diversion.

Details

ISSN :
00904295
Volume :
35
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2733921dd7286ee8452fa8e36fa2489c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(90)80154-f