Back to Search Start Over

Knowledge-based iterative reconstructions for imaging of coronary artery stents: first in-vitro experience and comparison of different radiation dose levels and kernel settings

Authors :
Bettina Baeßler
Alexander C. Bunck
Jan Robert Kroeger
Tilman Hickethier
Guido Michels
Dirk Müller
David Maintz
Source :
Acta Radiologica. 60:160-167
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
SAGE Publications, 2018.

Abstract

Background Advanced knowledge-based iterative model reconstructions (IMR) became recently available for routine computed tomography (CT). Using more realistic physical models it promises improved image quality and potential radiation dose reductions, both possibly beneficial for non-invasive assessment of coronary stents. Purpose To evaluate the influence of different IMR settings at different radiation doses on stent lumen visualization in comparison to filtered back projection (FBP) and first-generation (hybrid) iterative reconstruction (HIR). Material and Methods Ten coronary stents in a coronary phantom were examined at four different dose settings (120 kV/125 mAs, 120 kV/75 mAs, 100 kV/125 mAs, 100 kV/75 mAs). Images were reconstructed with stent-specific FBP and HIR kernels and with IMR using CardiacRoutine (CR) and CardiacSharp (CS) settings at three different iteration levels. Image quality was evaluated using established parameters: image noise; in-stent attenuation difference; and visible lumen diameter. Results Image noise was significantly lower in IMR than in corresponding HIR and FBP images. At lower radiation doses, image noise increased significantly except with IMR CR3 and IMR CS3. Visible lumen diameters were significantly larger with IMR CS than with FBP, HIR, and IMR CR. IMR CR showed the smallest attenuation difference, while attenuation was artificially decreased extensively with IMR CS. FBP and HIR showed moderately increased in-stent attenuations. No relevant influence of used radiation doses on visible lumen diameters or attenuation differences was found. Conclusion IMR CR reduces image noise significantly while offering comparable stent-specific image quality in comparison to FBP and HIR and therefore potentially facilitates stent lumen delineation. Utilization of IMR CS for stent evaluation seems unfavorable due to artificial image alterations.

Details

ISSN :
16000455 and 02841851
Volume :
60
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Acta Radiologica
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....27b9b4d5697ae393b34c74384e66a0ed
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185118778875