Back to Search Start Over

Extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock - Design and rationale of the ECLS-SHOCK trial

Authors :
Holger Thiele
Alper Öner
Peter Boekstegers
Ingo Voigt
Ulrich Laufs
Malte Kelm
Georg Fuernau
Maria Rubini Gimenez
Hans-Josef Feistritzer
Peter Abel
Christian W. Hamm
Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera
Carsten Tschöpe
Markus Ferrari
Tobias Graf
Carsten Skurk
Christian Karagiannidis
Benjamin Schempf
P. Christian Schulze
Tim Seidler
Tienush Rassaf
Michael R. Preusch
Helge Möllmann
Stephan B. Felix
Ralf Lehmann
Alexander Bufe
Harald Lapp
Christian Jung
Christoph Kadel
Ibrahim Akin
Ralf Muellenbach
Ulf Landmesser
Marcus Hennersdorf
Philipp Lauten
Janine Pöss
Ecls-Shock Investigators
Marko Noc
Hans-Bernd Hopf
Stephan Baldus
Peter Nordbeck
Dirk Westermann
Tomaz Goslar
Ilka Oerlecke
Axel Linke
Steffen Desch
Taoufik Ouarrak
Alexander Lauten
Peter Clemmensen
Felix Meincke
Michael Böhm
Holger Nef
Karsten Lenk
A A Mahabadi
Jutta Franz
Britta Goldmann
Steffen Schneider
Tobias Wengenmayer
Lars S Maier
Bernhard Schieffer
Alexander Kersten
Anne Freund
Thomas J. Dengler
Uwe Zeymer
Stefan Baumanns
Suzanne de Waha-Thiele
Stefan John
Daniel Sedding
Wolfgang Rottbauer
Leonhard Bruch
Melchior Seyfarth
Burkert Pieske
Source :
American Heart Journal. 234:1-11
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted. Study Design The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke. Conclusions The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Details

ISSN :
00028703
Volume :
234
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Heart Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....280f0ea0d6b5a3fdd6bd8042807f913a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.002