Back to Search Start Over

Survey of peptide quantification methods and comparison of their reproducibility: a case study using oxytocin

Authors :
Steven Walfish
Tursun Kerim
Timothy R. Rudd
Carolyn Swann
Sitaram Bhavaraju
William Sherwin
Silvia Arrastia
Wai Kei Shum
Tim Weel
Eric L. Kilpatrick
Arunima Pola
Margaret Butt
Sergi Pavon
Yukari Nakagawa
Kevin Grant
Andreas Blomgren
Yves Aubin
Jeremy E. Melanson
Fouad Atouf
Chensheng Li
Marie Pier Thibeault
Torgny Rundlöf
Dinesh Chalasani
Source :
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2018.

Abstract

USP’s peptide reference standards content is typically determined using an HPLC assay against an external standard for which the purity was determined by a mass balance approach. To explore the use of other analytical methods, the USP Biologics Department conducted a multi-laboratory collaborative study. The study determined the inter-laboratory variability for peptide quantitation using the following methods: HPLC assay, quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) spectroscopy, or amino acid analysis (AAA). The three methods were compared with regard to their suitability for quantitation of the nonapeptide oxytocin. In this study, the HPLC assay method using the same peptide bulk material as the standard showed the lowest inter-lab variability. The coefficient of variation (%CV) was calculated without counting the uncertainty associated with the purity assignment of the standard with mass balance. The proton qNMR method is a direct measurement of the peptide against an internal standard, which is not difficult to perform under common laboratory conditions. Because of the simpler operation and shorter analytical time, qNMR as a primary method for peptide reference standard value assignment deserves further exploration.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....28dacab7deefc7e6c917c6db2110e4fc