Back to Search Start Over

Impact of systemic antimicrobial therapy on mucosal staphylococci in a population of dogs in Northwest England

Authors :
Gina Pinchbeck
Nicola J. Williams
K. Marie McIntyre
Susan Dawson
Steve Shaw
Vanessa Schmidt
Neil McEwan
Tim Nuttall
Source :
Schmidt, V, Pinchbeck, G, Nuttall, T, Shaw, S, McIntyre, K, McEwan, N, Dawson, S & Williams, N 2018, ' Impact of systemic antimicrobial therapy on mucosal staphylococci in a population of dogs in Northwest England ', Veterinary Dermatology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 192-e70 . https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12538, Veterinary Dermatology: an international journal, VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Wiley, 2018.

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria are increasingly isolated from veterinary patients. Objectives To determine risk factors for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among canine mucosal staphylococci following routine antimicrobial treatment with cefalexin (CFX), clavulanate-amoxicillin (AC), cefovecin (CVN), clindamycin (CD) or a fluoroquinolone (FQ). Animals Mucosal swab samples (n = 463) were collected from 127 dogs pre-treatment, immediately, and at one- and three-months post-treatment. Methods Staphylococci were identified phenotypically and biochemically as coagulase negative (CoNS) or coagulase positive (CoPS); CoPS were speciated by nuc gene PCR. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using disc diffusion and mecA gene carriage by PCR. Multilevel, multivariable models examined associations between risk factors and presence/absence of CoPS, meticillin resistance (MR), multidrug-resistance (MDR) and fluoroquinolone resistance (FQR). Results The percentage of samples with CoNS increased and with CoPS (including S. pseudintermedius) decreased immediately post-treatment with CFX, CVN and CD (P ≤ 0.001) and one month post-treatment with CD (P = 0.003). By three months post-treatment, there was no significant difference compared to pre-treatment samples. Immediately post-treatment with FQs there was significantly increased risk of isolating MRS (P = 0.002), MDR (P = 0.002) or FQR (P = 0.013) staphylococci and of MDR following CFX treatment (P = 0.019). The percentage of samples with AMR staphylococci declined from immediately to three months post-treatment and there was no significant difference between resistance prevalence at one or three months post-treatment for most AMR traits and treatment groups. Exceptions include increased MDR following FQ (P = 0.048) or CFX (P = 0.021), at one and three months post-treatment, respectively. Conclusions and clinical importance Systemic antimicrobials impact on mucosal staphylococci. Immediately after therapy, the mucosa may be a reservoir for AMR staphylococci that are a source of mobile genetic elements carrying AMR genes.

Details

ISSN :
09594493
Volume :
29
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Veterinary Dermatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2947476f17d6ea05ed68a2fbfcb07251