Back to Search Start Over

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Authors :
Frank Edelmann
Carolyn S.P. Lam
Adriaan A. Voors
Piotr Ponikowski
Alan G. Fraser
Frank Ruschitzka
Stefan D. Anker
Erwan Donal
Rudolf A. de Boer
Burkert Pieske
Carsten Tschöpe
Petar M. Seferovic
Marco Guazzi
Michael Fu
Walter Paulus
Eike Nagel
Daniel A. Morris
Scott D. Solomon
Gerasimos Filippatos
Patrizio Lancellotti
Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher
Vojtech Melenovsky
Frans H. Rutten
Ramachandran S. Vasan
Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK)
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)
Berlin Institute of Health (BIH)
University of Groningen [Groningen]
Cardiff University
Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image (LTSI)
Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes]
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)
University Medical Center Groningen [Groningen] (UMCG)
GIGA [Université Liège]
Université de Liège
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM)
University of Wrocław [Poland] (UWr)
Harvard Medical School [Boston] (HMS)
Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM)
Boston University [Boston] (BU)
University Medical Center [Utrecht]
University Heart Centre Freiburg - Bad Krozingen
Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN)
University of Belgrade [Belgrade]
University of Cyprus [Nicosia]
Heart Failure Association
Cardiovascular Centre (CVC)
University of Zurich
Pieske, Burkert
Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
University of Cyprus [Nicosia] (UCY)
Source :
European Heart Journal, 40(40), 3297. Oxford University Press, European Heart Journal, European Heart Journal, Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy B, 2019, 40 (40), pp.3297-3317. ⟨10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641⟩, European Journal of Heart Failure, 22(3), 391-412. Wiley, European Heart Journal, 2019, 40 (40), pp.3297-3317. ⟨10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641⟩, European Heart Journal, 40(40), 3297-3317. Oxford University Press, Pieske, B, Tschöpe, C, De Boer, R A, Fraser, A G, Anker, S D, Donal, E, Edelmann, F, Fu, M, Guazzi, M, Lam, C S P, Lancellotti, P, Melenovsky, V, Morris, D A, Nagel, E, Pieske-Kraigher, E, Ponikowski, P, Solomon, S D, Vasan, R S, Rutten, F H, Voors, A A, Ruschitzka, F, Paulus, W J, Seferovic, P & Filippatos, G 2019, ' How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction : The HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: A consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) ', European Heart Journal, vol. 40, no. 40, pp. 3297-3317 . https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the ‘HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm’. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for HF symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e′), left ventricular (LV) filling pressure estimated using E/e′, left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2–4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0195668X, 15229645, and 13889842
Volume :
40
Issue :
40
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Heart Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....29f90cebf83cb41429b39f8308b42120
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641⟩