Back to Search
Start Over
An investigation into the use of MMCTP to tune accelerator source parameters and testing its clinical application
- Source :
- Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Scopus-Elsevier
- Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- This study investigates the dosimetry and radiobiological model variation when a second photon arc was added to prostate volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using the single‐arc technique. Dosimetry and radiobiological model comparison between the single‐arc and double‐arc prostate VMAT plans were performed on five patients with prostate volumes ranging from 29−68.1 cm3. The prescription dose was 78 Gy/39 fractions and the photon beam energy was 6 MV. Dose‐volume histogram, mean and maximum dose of targets (planning and clinical target volume) and normal tissues (rectum, bladder and femoral heads), dose‐volume criteria in the treatment plan (D99% of PTV; D30%,D50%,V17Gy and V35Gy of rectum and bladder; D5% of femoral heads), and dose profiles along the vertical and horizontal axis crossing the isocenter were determined using the single‐arc and double‐arc VMAT technique. For comparison, the monitor unit based on the RapidArc delivery method, prostate tumor control probability (TCP), and rectal normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) based on the Lyman‐Burman‐Kutcher algorithm were calculated. It was found that though the double‐arc technique required almost double the treatment time than the single‐arc, the double‐arc plan provided a better rectal and bladder dose‐volume criteria by shifting the delivered dose in the patient from the anterior–posterior direction to the lateral. As the femoral head was less radiosensitive than the rectum and bladder, the double‐arc technique resulted in a prostate VMAT plan with better prostate coverage and rectal dose‐volume criteria compared to the single‐arc. The prostate TCP of the double‐arc plan was found slightly increased (0.16%) compared to the single‐arc. Therefore, when the rectal dose‐volume criteria are very difficult to achieve in a single‐arc prostate VMAT plan, it is worthwhile to consider the double‐arc technique. PACS number: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.dk, 87.55.K‐, 87.55.Qr
- Subjects :
- treatment planning
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Computer science
Physics::Medical Physics
Monte Carlo method
VMAT
NTCP
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Radiation treatment planning
Monte Carlo
Instrumentation
Alternative methods
Radiation
Cytarabine
Process (computing)
Radiotherapy Dosage
dose‐volume histogram
stereotactic body radiotherapy
TCP
Monte Carlo Method
Algorithms
energy
medicine.medical_specialty
monte-carlo-simulation
Dose profile
prostate radiotherapy
issues
Sensitivity and Specificity
Set (abstract data type)
tuning
medicine
Radiation Oncology Physics
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Medical physics
Sensitivity (control systems)
IMRT
helical tomotherpy
Thioguanine
Radiometry
Simulation
source optimization
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Reproducibility of Results
sensitivity
AAPM Reports & Documents
electron-beam
lung cancer
radiotherapy photon beams
Particle Accelerators
Radiotherapy, Conformal
RapidArc
Health Physics
Energy (signal processing)
Software
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15269914
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of applied clinical medical physics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2b29f091c4e1df04e9b43a16ca51fd48