Back to Search Start Over

Can we trust self-reported walking distance when determining EDSS scores in patients with multiple sclerosis? The Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study

Authors :
Egon Stenager
Ulrik Dalgas
Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk
Peter Feys
Lars G. Hvid
Finn Boesen
Michael Nørgaard
Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen
Thor Petersen
Marie Louise Kjeldgaard-Jørgensen
Source :
Skjerbæk, A G, Boesen, F, Petersen, T, Rasmussen, P V, Stenager, E, Nørgaard, M, Feys, P, Kjeldgaard-Jørgensen, M L, Hvid, L G & Dalgas, U 2019, ' Can we trust self-reported walking distance when determining EDSS scores in patients with multiple sclerosis? The Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study ', Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1653-1660 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518795416, Skjerbæk, A G, Boesen, F, Petersen, T, Rasmussen, P V, Stenager, E, Nørgaard, M, Feys, P, Kjeldgaard-Jørgensen, M L, Hvid, L G & Dalgas, U 2019, ' Can we trust self-reported walking distance when determining EDSS scores in patients with multiple sclerosis? The Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study ', Multiple Sclerosis Journal, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1653-1660 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518795416
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: In multiple sclerosis (MS), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) reflects disease severity. Although parts of the EDSS are dependent on actual walking distance, self-reported statements are often applied. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was, therefore, to compare self-reported walking distance to actual walking distance to outline how this influences EDSS scoring. Methods: MS patients with EDSS 4.0–7.5 ( n = 273) were included from the Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study ( n = 427). All patients subjectively classified their maximal walking distance according to one of seven categories (>500; 300–499; 200–299; 100–199; 20–99; 5–19; 0–4 m). Subsequently, actual maximal walking distance was assessed and EDSS was determined from both self-reported walking distance (EDSSself-report) and actual walking distance (EDSSactual). Results: In 145 patients (53%), self-reported walking distance was misclassified when compared to the actual walking distance. Misclassification was more frequent in patients using walking aids (64% vs. 44%, p self-report vs EDSSactual) of ⩾0.5 point in 24%. Conclusion: In MS patients with EDSS 4.0–7.5, 53% misclassified their walking distance yielding incorrect EDSS scores in 24%. Therefore, correct EDSS determination must be based on measurement of actual walking distance.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Skjerbæk, A G, Boesen, F, Petersen, T, Rasmussen, P V, Stenager, E, Nørgaard, M, Feys, P, Kjeldgaard-Jørgensen, M L, Hvid, L G & Dalgas, U 2019, ' Can we trust self-reported walking distance when determining EDSS scores in patients with multiple sclerosis? The Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study ', Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1653-1660 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518795416, Skjerbæk, A G, Boesen, F, Petersen, T, Rasmussen, P V, Stenager, E, Nørgaard, M, Feys, P, Kjeldgaard-Jørgensen, M L, Hvid, L G & Dalgas, U 2019, ' Can we trust self-reported walking distance when determining EDSS scores in patients with multiple sclerosis? The Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study ', Multiple Sclerosis Journal, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1653-1660 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518795416
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2d650bd8c0aa8a8527a7895d0c5a055f