Back to Search
Start Over
Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Source :
- BMC Medicine, BMC Medicine, BioMed Central, 2017, 15, pp.193. ⟨10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x⟩, BMC Medicine, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2017), BMC Medicine, BioMed Central, 2017, 15, pp.193. 〈10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x〉, BMC Medicine, 2017, 15, pp.193. ⟨10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Background Docetaxel, pemetrexed, erlotinib, and gefitinib are recommended as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, the number of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on this topic is increasing. Our objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of all second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown status for EGFR by a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the US Food and Drug Administration website, as well as other sources, were searched for available reports up to June 6, 2017. Two reviewers independently selected published and unpublished reports of RCTs comparing any second-line treatments, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of all included trials. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included objective response (ObR), the number of serious adverse events, and quality of life. Results We included 102 RCTs involving 36,058 patients (62% male, median age 61 years, 81% with stage IV cancer, 80% smokers, and 92% with performance status 0–1). We revealed a differential reporting of outcomes between efficacy and safety outcomes. Half of the trials reported safety outcomes and less than 20% quality of life. For OS, nivolumab was more effective than docetaxel (hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.56–0.83), pemetrexed (0.67, 0.52–0.83), erlotinib (0.68, 0.53–0.86), and gefitinib (0.66, 0.53–0.83). Pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and pemetrexed plus erlotinib were also significantly more effective than docetaxel, pemetrexed, erlotinib, and gefitinib. For PFS, erlotinib plus cabozantinib was more effective than docetaxel (HR 0.39, 95% CrI 0.18–0.84), pemetrexed (0.38, 0.18–0.82), erlotinib (0.37, 0.18–0.78), and gefitinib (0.38, 0.18–0.82). Cabozantinib and pemetrexed plus erlotinib were also significantly more effective than the four recommended treatments. For ObR, no treatment was significantly more effective. The effectiveness of the four recommended treatments was similar and they were ranked among the 25 less-effective treatments. For safety, evidence is insufficient to draw certain conclusions. Conclusions Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and pemetrexed plus erlotinib may be the most effective second-line treatments for NSCLC in terms of OS. The four recommended treatments seem to have relatively poor performance. However, the impact on life expectancy of immunotherapy versus other treatments should be further explored by future analyses, and more trials comparing the novel treatments are needed to reduce uncertainty in these results. Trial registration Registration number: PROSPERO (CRD42015017592) Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Subjects :
- Oncology
Lung Neoplasms
Network Meta-Analysis
lcsh:Medicine
Pharmacology
NSCLC
[ SDV.CAN ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer
0302 clinical medicine
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
030212 general & internal medicine
Epidermal growth factor receptor
biology
Treatments
General Medicine
3. Good health
Pemetrexed
Docetaxel
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Erlotinib
Immunotherapy
[SDV.IMM.IMM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology/Immunotherapy
Wild-type EGFR
medicine.drug
Research Article
medicine.medical_specialty
[SDV.SP.MED] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences/Medication
[ SDV.IMM.IMM ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology/Immunotherapy
[SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer
Comparative effectiveness review
03 medical and health sciences
Gefitinib
[SDV.CAN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer
[SDV.SP.MED]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences/Medication
Atezolizumab
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Lung cancer
neoplasms
Performance status
business.industry
[ SDV.SP.MED ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences/Medication
lcsh:R
[SDV.IMM.IMM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology/Immunotherapy
medicine.disease
respiratory tract diseases
Mutation
biology.protein
Systematic review
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17417015
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMC Medicine, BMC Medicine, BioMed Central, 2017, 15, pp.193. ⟨10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x⟩, BMC Medicine, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2017), BMC Medicine, BioMed Central, 2017, 15, pp.193. 〈10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x〉, BMC Medicine, 2017, 15, pp.193. ⟨10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2db1f69702b3f2d033ca8c9a0b1ddd72
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x⟩