Back to Search
Start Over
Drug delivery analysis of the Canadian multicenter trial in non-small-cell lung cancer
- Source :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology. 12:2333-2339
- Publication Year :
- 1994
- Publisher :
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 1994.
-
Abstract
- PURPOSE The Canadian multicenter trial for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) reported survival benefit for chemotherapy when best supportive care was compared with vindesine-cisplatin (VP) and the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP). We examined received drug delivery to document dose-intensity (DI) and total dose of drugs given to various groups in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Plots of cumulatively received chemotherapy against time were used to evaluate drug delivery by regimen, major prognostic factors, and response status. RESULTS Individual CAP patients show a narrow range of received DI, with the median similar to protocol. Drug delivery analysis exposed a wide range of received DI for both drugs in the more intensive VP regimen, and the median received DI was below protocol. The median received DI for cisplatin was still higher for VP than CAP, but only during the first 8 weeks of protocol treatment (20 v 10 mg/m2/wk); thereafter, the ongoing received cisplatin DI was the same (10 mg/m2/wk). The median received DI for cisplatin in each regimen was not influenced by stage, performance status, prior weight loss, sex, or response status. VP-treated patients received a higher total dose of cisplatin than CAP patients (median, 255 mg/m2 v 112.5 mg/m2; P < .0001). Median cisplatin total dose was similar for patients with a chemotherapy response or stable disease and threefold greater than for patients with progressive disease for both regimens. Although patients with chemotherapy response and stable disease had similar survival outcomes for both CAP and VP, the VP regimen had a higher proportion of patients without progressive disease (P = .004), which resulted in an overall survival advantage (P = .01). CONCLUSION The major prognostic factors for advanced NSCLC do not exert their influence on outcome by affecting deliverable chemotherapy DI. Regimen and treatment response determined total dose. Because stable disease patients usually outnumber responding patients in advanced NSCLC trials, controlled studies should be performed that allow assessment of the impact of total received dose on outcome according to response status.
- Subjects :
- Oncology
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Lung Neoplasms
Vindesine
Cyclophosphamide
medicine.medical_treatment
Adenocarcinoma
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Delivery Systems
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Internal medicine
Multicenter trial
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
medicine
Humans
Doxorubicin
Lung cancer
Postoperative Care
Cisplatin
Chemotherapy
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
business.industry
Middle Aged
Prognosis
medicine.disease
Survival Analysis
Surgery
Regimen
Drug delivery
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Phosphoramide Mustards
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15277755 and 0732183X
- Volume :
- 12
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....2dcfe92ac79b379900ec0eaf7b5cd128
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.11.2333