Back to Search Start Over

Anlotinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial

Authors :
Xiuwen Wang
Jianhui Ma
Hong Luo
Jinwan Wang
Shukui Qin
Hanzhong Li
Ji-Yan Liu
Jun Li
Cheng Fu
Benkang Shi
Yuxian Bai
Ai Ping Zhou
Dingwei Ye
Xiu Bao Ren
Xianzhong Bai
Yan Song
Ying Cheng
Source :
The Oncologist. 24:e702-e708
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019.

Abstract

Background Anlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor inhibiting angiogenesis. This multicenter, randomized phase II trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in comparison with sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Materials and Methods Patients with mRCC from 13 clinical centers were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive anlotinib (n = 90) or sunitinib (n = 43). Anlotinib was given orally at a dose of 12 mg once daily (2 weeks on/1 week off), and sunitinib was given orally at 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results The median PFS was similar with anlotinib and sunitinib (17.5 vs. 16.6 months, p > .05). The median OS (30.9 vs. 30.5 months, p > .05), ORR (30.3% vs. 27.9%), and 6-week DCR (97.8% vs. 93.0%) were similar in the two groups. Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or 4 were significantly less frequent with anlotinib than with sunitinib (28.9% vs. 55.8%, p Conclusion The clinical efficacy of anlotinib was similar to that of sunitinib as the first-line treatment for mRCC, but with a more favorable safety profile.

Details

ISSN :
1549490X and 10837159
Volume :
24
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Oncologist
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2de4481151e9a6f54c3942809c84b639
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0839