Cite
In utero Repair of Myelomeningocele: A Comparison of Endoscopy and Hysterotomy
MLA
William O. Richards, et al. “In Utero Repair of Myelomeningocele: A Comparison of Endoscopy and Hysterotomy.” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 15, Jan. 2000, pp. 83–88. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....2e2e199c08f92ea501d3db4b478e2221&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
William O. Richards, Frank H. Boehm, Joseph P. Bruner, Noel Tulipan, William F. Walsh, & Eileen K. Vrabcak. (2000). In utero Repair of Myelomeningocele: A Comparison of Endoscopy and Hysterotomy. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 15, 83–88.
Chicago
William O. Richards, Frank H. Boehm, Joseph P. Bruner, Noel Tulipan, William F. Walsh, and Eileen K. Vrabcak. 2000. “In Utero Repair of Myelomeningocele: A Comparison of Endoscopy and Hysterotomy.” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 15 (January): 83–88. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....2e2e199c08f92ea501d3db4b478e2221&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.