Back to Search Start Over

Two-photon photoemission from a copper cathode in anX-band photoinjector

Authors :
Chris Adolphsen
Stephen Weathersby
Tor Raubenheimer
Keith Jobe
C. Limborg-Deprey
A. Vrielink
M. Dunning
Faya Wang
Theodore Vecchione
Heng Li
D. McCormick
Source :
Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, Vol 19, Iss 2, p 023401 (2016)
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
American Physical Society (APS), 2016.

Abstract

This paper presents two-photon photoemission from a copper cathode in an $X$-band photoinjector. We experimentally verified that the electron bunch charge from photoemission out of a copper cathode scales with laser intensity (I) square for 400 nm wavelength photons. We compare this two-photon photoemission process with the single photon process at 266 nm. Despite the high reflectivity ($R$) of the copper surface for 400 nm photons ($R=0.48$) and higher thermal energy of photoelectrons (two-photon at 200 nm) compared to 266 nm photoelectrons, the quantum efficiency of the two-photon photoemission process (400 nm) exceeds the single-photon process (266 nm) when the incident laser intensity is above $300\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GW}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$. At the same laser pulse energy ($E$) and other experimental conditions, emitted charge scales inversely with the laser pulse duration. A thermal emittance of 2.7 mm-mrad per mm root mean square (rms) was measured on our cathode which exceeds by sixty percent larger compared to the theoretical predictions, but this discrepancy is similar to previous experimental thermal emittance on copper cathodes with 266 nm photons. The damage of the cathode surface of our first-generation $X$-band gun from both rf breakdowns and laser impacts mostly explains this result. Using a 400 nm laser can substantially simplify the photoinjector system, and make it an alternative solution for compact pulsed electron sources.

Details

ISSN :
24699888
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....2f3b1df8e634bc0b3d07bc2e9c65a625
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.19.023401