Back to Search
Start Over
The diagnostic value of 24-hour ambulatory intraesophageal pH-impedance in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms comparable with typical symptoms
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- SAGE Publications, 2016.
-
Abstract
- WOS: 000405291100003<br />PubMed ID: 28815026<br />Background: The diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux is currently based on a combination of the patient history of multichannel intraluminal impedance and ambulatory pH (MII-pH); however, none of these findings alone is specific for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. We aimed to compare the baseline characteristics and esophageal baseline impedance values between patients with and without laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from two groups of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux according to their reflux finding score (RFS) as scored by ENTs. Control patients were nonerosive reflux disease patients without laryngopharyngeal reflux. All MII-pH parameters and baseline impedance were analyzed from six levels and the proximal and distal baseline impedance and the ratio of the proximal to distal baseline impedance levels was calculated. Results: Altogether 123 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux and 49 control patients were included. A total of 81 of 123 patients had RFS >= 7, and 42 of 123 patients had RFS > 7. Baseline impedance analysis showed that patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms had significantly lower proximal baseline impedance values (1997 +/- 51 vs 2245 +/- 109, p < 0.05) than the control group. Additionally, patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms had a significantly lower proximal-to-distal ratio (1.28 +/- 0.05 vs 1.53 +/- 0.09, p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, patients with RFS < 7 were found to have a significantly lower acid exposure time than either the patients with RFS >= 7 (3.85 +/- 0.65 vs 8.2 +/- 1.52, p < 0.05) or the control group (3.85 +/- 0.65 vs 6.1 +/- 0.81, p < 0.05). Additionally, patients with RFS7 had significantly lower proximal baseline impedance levels than the control group (1970 +/- 63 vs 2245 +/- 109, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with pathologic laryngopharyngeal reflux symptom scores had lower proximal baseline impedance levels and lower proximal-to-distal ratios, which may reflect the proximal mucosal noxious effect of the refluxate. These results may indicate that laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms may be due to chronic acid exposure in the proximal segments of the esophagus, and the proximal-to-distal ratio may be used as a new metric for diagnosis.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Baseline impedance
gastroesophageal reflux
reflux finding score
Gastroenterology
03 medical and health sciences
Laryngopharyngeal reflux
0302 clinical medicine
Internal medicine
medicine
proximal to distal ratio
Medical history
In patient
business.industry
laryngopharyngeal reflux
digestive, oral, and skin physiology
Reflux
Original Articles
medicine.disease
digestive system diseases
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Baseline characteristics
Ambulatory
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3114348af1b2ea5b86da84b7086dc438