Back to Search Start Over

Design and Planning of a Transdisciplinary Investigation into Farmland Pollinators: Rationale, Co-Design, and Lessons Learned

Authors :
Simon Hodge
Oliver Schweiger
Alexandra-Maria Klein
Simon G. Potts
Cecilia Costa
Matthias Albrecht
Joachim R. de Miranda
Marika Mand
Pilar De la Rúa
Maj Rundlöf
Eleanor Attridge
Robin Dean
Philippe Bulet
Denis Michez
Robert J. Paxton
Aurélie Babin
Nicolas Cougoule
Marion Laurent
Anne-Claire Martel
Laurianne Paris
Marie-Pierre Rivière
Eric Dubois
Marie-Pierre Chauzat
Karim Arafah
Dalel Askri
Sebastien N. Voisin
Tomasz Kiljanek
Irene Bottero
Christophe Dominik
Giovanni Tamburini
Maria Helena Pereira-Peixoto
Dimitry Wintermantel
Tom D. Breeze
Elena Cini
Deepa Senapathi
Gennaro Di Prisco
Piotr Medrzycki
Steffen Hagenbucher
Anina Knauer
Janine M. Schwarz
Risto Raimets
Vicente Martínez-López
Kjell Ivarsson
Chris Hartfield
Pamela Hunter
Mark J. F. Brown
Jane C. Stout
Trinity College Dublin
Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung = Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ)
University of Freiburg [Freiburg]
University of Reading (UOR)
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche [Bologna] (CNR)
Agroscope
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)
Estonian University of Life Sciences (EMU)
Universidad de Murcia
Lund University [Lund]
The Red Beehive Co. Ltd
Partenaires INRAE
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
University of Mons [Belgium] (UMONS)
Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
Unité Pathologie de l'abeille (UPA)
Laboratoire de Sophia Antipolis
Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES)-Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES)
Laboratoire de santé animale, sites de Maisons-Alfort et de Normandie
Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES)
BioPark Archamps (BioPark)
National Veterinary Research Institute [Pulawy, Pologne] (NVRI)
Swedish Farmers' Foundation for Agricultural Research
National Farmers' Union
British Beekeepers Association
Royal Holloway [University of London] (RHUL)
European Project: 773921,Horizon 2020,PoshBee(2018)
Source :
Sustainability; Volume 14; Issue 17; Pages: 10549, Sustainability, Sustainability, 2022, 14 (17), pp.10549. ⟨10.3390/su141710549⟩
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2022.

Abstract

International audience; To provide a complete portrayal of the multiple factors negatively impacting insects in agricultural landscapes it is necessary to assess the concurrent incidence, magnitude, and interactions among multiple stressors over substantial biogeographical scales. Trans-national ecological field investigations with wide-ranging stakeholders typically encounter numerous challenges during the design planning stages, not least that the scientific soundness of a spatially replicated study design must account for the substantial geographic and climatic variation among distant sites. ‘PoshBee’ (Pan-European assessment, monitoring, and mitigation of Stressors on the Health of Bees) is a multi-partner transdisciplinary agroecological project established to investigate the suite of stressors typically encountered by pollinating insects in European agricultural landscapes. To do this, PoshBee established a network of 128 study sites across eight European countries and collected over 50 measurements and samples relating to the nutritional, toxicological, pathogenic, and landscape components of the bees’ environment. This paper describes the development process, rationale, and end-result of each aspect of the of the PoshBee field investigation. We describe the main issues and challenges encountered during the design stages and highlight a number of actions or processes that may benefit other multi-partner research consortia planning similar large-scale studies. It was soon identified that in a multi-component study design process, the development of interaction and communication networks involving all collaborators and stakeholders requires considerable time and resources. It was also necessary at each planning stage to be mindful of the needs and objectives of all stakeholders and partners, and further challenges inevitably arose when practical limitations, such as time restrictions and labour constraints, were superimposed upon prototype study designs. To promote clarity for all stakeholders, for each sub-component of the study, there should be a clear record of the rationale and reasoning that outlines how the final design transpired, what compromises were made, and how the requirements of different stakeholders were accomplished. Ultimately, multi-national agroecological field studies such as PoshBee benefit greatly from the involvement of diverse stakeholders and partners, ranging from field ecologists, project managers, policy legislators, mathematical modelers, and farmer organisations. While the execution of the study highlighted the advantages and benefits of large-scale transdisciplinary projects, the long planning period emphasized the need to formally describe a design framework that could facilitate the design process of future multi-partner collaborations.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20711050
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Sustainability; Volume 14; Issue 17; Pages: 10549
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....312240e5df1aa25ae925ec685e9c67d0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710549