Back to Search Start Over

Deliberating performance targets workshop: Potential paths for emerging PM2.5 and O3 air sensor progress

Authors :
Anthony S. Wexler
N.A. Martin
Michael H. Bergin
L. Hassinger
Grant R. Allen
D. Jack
Michael P. Hannigan
R. Subramanian
Jay R. Turner
James J. Schauer
Gayle S.W. Hagler
Zhi Ning
George D. Thurston
Peter K.K. Louie
Vasu Kilaru
Edmund Seto
G. Pierce
Robert Judge
Michele Penza
Rima Habre
Ron Williams
Rachelle M. Duvall
K. Ray
Joann Rice
Andrea Polidori
Amanda Kaufman
Katherine B. Benedict
M. Gerboles
Ronald C. Cohen
P. Fransioli
Williams, R.
Duvall, R.
Kilaru, V.
Hagler, G.
Hassinger, L.
Benedict, K.
Rice, J.
Kaufman, A.
Judge, R.
Pierce, G.
Allen, G.
Bergin, M.
Cohen, R. C.
Fransioli, P.
Gerboles, M.
Habre, R.
Hannigan, M.
Jack, D.
Louie, P.
Martin, N. A.
Penza, M.
Polidori, A.
Subramanian, R.
Ray, K.
Schauer, J.
Seto, E.
Thurston, G.
Turner, J.
Wexler, A. S.
Ning, Z.
Source :
Atmospheric Environment: X, Vol 2, Iss, Pp-(2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
eScholarship, University of California, 2019.

Abstract

The United States Environmental Protection Agency held an international two-day workshop in June 2018 to deliberate possible performance targets for non-regulatory fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) air sensors. The need for a workshop arose from the lack of any market-wide manufacturer requirement for documented sensor performance evaluations, the lack of any independent third party or government-based sensor performance certification program, and uncertainty among all users as to the general usability of air sensor data. A multi-sector subject matter expert panel was assembled to facilitate an open discussion on these issues with multiple stakeholders. This summary provides an overview of the workshop purpose, key findings from the deliberations, and considerations for future actions specific to sensors. Important findings concerning PM2.5 and O3 sensors included the lack of consistent performance indicators and statistical metrics as well as highly variable data quality requirements depending on the intended use. While the workshop did not attempt to yield consensus on any topic, a key message was that a number of possible future actions would be beneficial to all stakeholders regarding sensor technologies. These included documentation of best practices, sharing quality assurance results along with sensor data, and the development of a common performance target lexicon, performance targets, and test protocols. Keywords: Low-cost air quality sensors, Performance targets, PM2.5, Ozone

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Atmospheric Environment: X, Vol 2, Iss, Pp-(2019)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....325df9374c95dfba9f134180d171792b