Back to Search Start Over

Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Authors :
Lucy Timbrell
Paloma de la Peña
Amy Way
Christian Hoggard
Lucinda Backwell
null Francesco d’Errico
Lyn Wadley
Matt Grove
Source :
Quaternary Science Reviews
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Lithic assemblages immediately following the Howiesons Poort, often loosely referred to as the ‘post- Howiesons Poort’ or MSA III, have attracted relatively little attention when compared to other wellknown phases of the South African Middle Stone Age (MSA) sequence. Current evidence from sites occurring in widely-differing environments suggests that these assemblages are marked by temporal and technological variability, with few features in common other than the presence of unifacial points. Here we present a technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘points’ from the new excavations of Members 2 BS, 2WA and the top of 3 BS members at Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, one of the key sites for studying modern human cultural evolution. Our complementary methodologies demonstrate that, at this site, hominins adopted a knapping strategy that primarily produced non-standardised unretouched points. Triangular morphologies were manufactured using a variety of reduction strategies, of which the discoidal and Levallois recurrent centripetal methods produced distinctive morphologies. We find technological and morphological variability increases throughout the post-Howiesons Poort sequence, with clear differences between and within chrono-stratigraphic groups. Finally, we assess the suitability of the ‘Sibudan’ cultural-technological typology proposed for post-Howiesons Poort assemblages at Sibhudu, another KwaZulu-Natal site, and find similarities in the morphological axes characterising the samples, despite differences in the shaping strategies adopted. Overall, our work contributes to the growing body of research that is helping to address historical research biases that have slanted our understanding of cultural evolution during the MSA of southern Africa towards the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort technocomplexes.<br />UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)<br />Arts & Humanities Research Council (AHRC) NGS-54810R-19<br />Wenner Gren Foundation CEOOP2020-1<br />Poroulis grant through Cambridge University<br />Spanish FEDER/Ministry of Science and Innovation 262618<br />National Geographic Explorer grant ANR-10-LABX-52<br />DSI- NRF Centre of Excellence in Palaeosciences grant 191022_001<br />Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme<br />LaScArBx research programme<br />Grand Programme de Recherche 'Human Past' of the Initiative d'Excellence (IdEx) of the Bordeaux University<br />Leakey Foundation (Movement, interaction, and structure: modelling population networks and cultural diversity in the African Middle Stone Age)<br />Lithic Studies Society (Jacobi Bursary Awardee, 2020)<br />SFF Centre for Early Sapiens Behaviour (SapienCE)<br />Talents Programme AH/R012792/1 Gr. 10157 PID2019-1049449 GB-I00

Details

ISSN :
02773791 and 20191049
Volume :
297
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Quaternary Science Reviews
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....3488aec267e12c1ab968b107e0096c54
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107813