Back to Search
Start Over
Assessing physicians’ and nurses’ experience of dying and death in the ICU: development of the CAESAR-P and the CAESAR-N instruments
- Source :
- Critical Care, Critical Care, 2020, 24 (1), ⟨10.1186/s13054-020-03191-z⟩, Critical Care, BioMed Central, 2020, 24 (1), ⟨10.1186/s13054-020-03191-z⟩, Critical Care, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020)
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background As an increasing number of deaths occur in the intensive care unit (ICU), studies have sought to describe, understand, and improve end-of-life care in this setting. Most of these studies are centered on the patient’s and/or the relatives’ experience. Our study aimed to develop an instrument designed to assess the experience of physicians and nurses of patients who died in the ICU, using a mixed methodology and validated in a prospective multicenter study. Methods Physicians and nurses of patients who died in 41 ICUs completed the job strain and the CAESAR questionnaire within 24 h after the death. The psychometric validation was conducted using two datasets: a learning and a reliability cohort. Results Among the 475 patients included in the main cohort, 398 nurse and 417 physician scores were analyzed. The global score was high for both nurses [62/75 (59; 66)] and physicians [64/75 (61; 68)]. Factors associated with higher CAESAR-Nurse scores were absence of conflict with physicians, pain control handled with physicians, death disclosed to the family at the bedside, and invasive care not performed. As assessed by the job strain instrument, low decision control was associated with lower CAESAR score (61 (58; 65) versus 63 (60; 67), p = 0.002). Factors associated with higher CAESAR-Physician scores were room dedicated to family information, information delivered together by nurse and physician, families systematically informed of the EOL decision, involvement of the nurse during implementation of the EOL decision, and open visitation. They were also higher when a decision to withdraw or withhold treatment was made, no cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed, and the death was disclosed to the family at the bedside. Conclusion We described and validated a new instrument for assessing the experience of physicians and nurses involved in EOL in the ICU. This study shows important areas for improving practices.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Attitude to Death
Psychometrics
Attitude of Health Personnel
medicine.medical_treatment
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Nurses
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
law.invention
Life Change Events
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Pain control
law
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
medicine
Humans
Intensive care unit
Prospective Studies
End-of-life experience
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Decision control
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Job strain
business.industry
Research
lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
Reproducibility of Results
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
lcsh:RC86-88.9
Middle Aged
3. Good health
Death
[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]
Intensive Care Units
Caregivers
Multicenter study
Family medicine
Cohort
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 13648535 and 1466609X
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Critical Care, Critical Care, 2020, 24 (1), ⟨10.1186/s13054-020-03191-z⟩, Critical Care, BioMed Central, 2020, 24 (1), ⟨10.1186/s13054-020-03191-z⟩, Critical Care, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3497093b3e5ba762e24e41444a3f3377
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03191-z⟩