Back to Search Start Over

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab or Treatment of Physician’s Choice

Authors :
Domenica Lorusso
Nicoletta Colombo
Antonio Casado Herraez
Alessandro D. Santin
Emeline Colomba
David Scott Miller
Keiichi Fujiwara
Sandro Pignata
Sally E. Baron-Hay
Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer
Yong Man Kim
Mary McCormack
Rachid Massaad
Allison Martin Nguyen
Qi Zhao
Jodi McKenzie
Vimalanand S. Prabhu
Vicky Makker
Lorusso, D
Colombo, N
Herraez, A
Santin, A
Colomba, E
Miller, D
Fujiwara, K
Pignata, S
Baron-Hay, S
Ray-Coquard, I
Shapira-Frommer, R
Kim, Y
Mccormack, M
Massaad, R
Nguyen, A
Zhao, Q
Mckenzie, J
Prabhu, V
Makker, V
Source :
European Journal of Cancer. 186:172-184
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2023.

Abstract

Purpose: Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab (LEN+PEMBRO) demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in efficacy versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) in the phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) is reported. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive LEN+PEMBRO (n = 411; LEN 20 mg/day; PEMBRO 200 mg Q3W) or TPC (n = 416; doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 Q3W or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 [weekly, 3 weeks on/1 week off]). Impact of treatment on HRQoL assessed by the global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) score of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was a secondary objective; other scales of the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ-Endometrial, 24 questions (EORTC QLQ-EN24), and EuroQoL 5 dimensions, 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) were exploratory objectives. HRQoL was assessed on day 1 of each cycle. Completion/compliance, change from baseline, time to first and definitive deterioration were assessed. No multiplicity adjustments were applied for HRQoL endpoints. Results: The latest timepoint at which the predefined rates of completion (≥60%) and compliance (≥80%) were met was week 12. HRQoL at week 12 between treatment groups was generally similar. Time to first deterioration symptom scales favoured LEN+PEMBRO for QLQ-C30 dyspnoea, and QLQ-EN24 for poor body image, tingling/numbness, and hair loss; and TPC was favoured for QLQ-C30 pain, appetite loss, and diarrhoea, and QLQ-EN24 muscular pain. While the QLQ-C30 physical functional scale favoured TPC, other functional scales were generally similar between arms. Time to definitive deterioration favoured LEN+PEMBRO on most scales. Conclusion: HRQoL data from Study 309/KEYNOTE-775, with previously published efficacy and safety results, indicate that LEN+PEMBRO has an overall favourable benefit/risk profile versus TPC for the treatment of patients with aEC.

Details

ISSN :
09598049
Volume :
186
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....34e467942ab91ce7eb6b99bbeab0ae68
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.015