Back to Search
Start Over
Helical CT of the liver: evaluation of injection flow rate, mode, and scan delay with a reduced-volume contrast medium bolus
- Source :
- Journal of computer assisted tomography. 19(3)
- Publication Year :
- 1995
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVE The impact of injection flow rates, mono- or biphasic injection mode, and scan delay on liver and portal vein enhancement with helical CT was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS The liver of 75 consecutive patients was examined with helical CT before and after injection of 100 ml iopromide (30 g of iodine). Patients were randomly assigned to three protocols: (1) injection flow: 2 ml/s; (2) injection flow; 4 ml/s (60 ml) + 2 ml/s (40 ml); and (3) injection flow: 4 ml/s. Scanning started 40 s after the beginning of contrast material injection. A second scan was performed 70 s after contrast agent injection in Protocol 1. RESULTS Mean parenchymal contrast enhancement was highest with Protocol 3 (48.5 HU) followed by Protocols 2 (38.9 HU) and 1 (early: 21 HU; late: 30.7 HU), with all differences being significant (p < 0.01). Enhancement of the portal vein was significantly higher with Protocols 3 and 2 (121 and 118 HU) than with Protocol 1 (early: 64 HU; late: 75 HU). CONCLUSION Good enhancement of the liver parenchyma and the portal vessels can be obtained with 30 g of iodine if a monophasic injection with a flow rate of 4 ml/s is used.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Contrast enhancement
Iohexol
Hemodynamics
chemistry.chemical_element
Iodine
Bolus (medicine)
Medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Prospective Studies
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
business.industry
Body Weight
Iopromide
Middle Aged
Helical ct
Volumetric flow rate
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Contrast medium
chemistry
Liver
Injections, Intravenous
Female
business
Nuclear medicine
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 03638715
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of computer assisted tomography
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....3544b69dd044a47fab26538f948b0aa5