Impact of Preload on Right Ventricular Hemodynamics in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

OBJECTIVES: To compare the hemodynamic effects of increased versus decreased preload in a porcine model of acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.DESIGN: Randomized, controlled animal study.SETTING: Tertiary medical center, animal research laboratory.SUBJECTS: Female, Danish slaughter pigs (n = 22, ~ 60 kg).INTERVENTIONS: Acute pulmonary embolism was induced by large emboli made from clotting of autologous blood. Sixteen animals were randomized to either fluid loading (n = 8, isotonic saline, 1 L/hr for 2 hr) or diuretic treatment (n = 8, furosemide, 40 mg every 30 min, total 160 mg) and compared with a vehicle group (n = 6, no treatment).MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hemodynamics were evaluated at baseline, after pulmonary embolism and after each dose by biventricular pressure-volume loops, invasive pressures, diuretic output, respiratory variables, and blood analysis. Pulmonary embolism increased mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p < 0.0001), pulmonary vascular resistance (p = 0.008), right ventricular arterial elastance (p = 0.003), and right ventricular end-systolic volume (p = 0.020) while right ventricular stroke volume and right ventricular ejection fraction were decreased (p = 0.047 and p = 0.0003, respectively) compared with baseline. Fluid loading increased right ventricular end-diastolic volume (+31 ± 13 mL; p = 0.004), right ventricular stroke volume (+23 ± 10 mL; p = 0.009), cardiac output (+2,021 ± 956 mL; p = 0.002), and right ventricular ejection fraction (+7.6% ± 1.5%; p = 0.032), whereas pulmonary vascular resistance decreased (-202 ± 65 dynes; p = 0.020) compared with vehicle. Diuretic treatment decreased right ventricular end-diastolic volume (-84 ± 11 mL; p < 0.001), right ventricular stroke volume (-40 ± 6 mL; p = 0.001), cardiac output (-3,327 ± 451 mL; p = 0.005), and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (-7 ± 1 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and increased right ventricular end-systolic elastance (+0.72 ± 0.2 mm Hg/mL; p < 0.001) and systemic vascular resistance (+1,812 ± 767 dynes; p < 0.001) with no effects on mean arterial pressure.CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model of acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, fluid loading increased right ventricular preload and right ventricular stroke volume, whereas diuretics decreased right ventricular preload and right ventricular stroke volume without affecting mean arterial pressure.